Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Justin Kilpatrick" <justin@althea.net>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cake] Fighting bloat in the face of uncertinty
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2019 18:42:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac3db996-6769-4e38-b19b-eaa08ac40cd5@www.fastmail.com> (raw)

I'm using Cake on embedded OpenWRT devices. You probably saw this video on the list a month or two ago. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4EKbgShyLw

Anyways up until now I've left cake totally untuned and had pretty great results. But we've finally encountered a scenario where untuned Cake allowed for unacceptable bufferbloat on a link.

Hand configuration in accordance with the best practices provided in the RFC works out perfectly, but I need a set of settings I can ship with any device with the expectation that it will be used and abused in many non-standard situations. Producing non-optimal outcomes is fine, producing dramatically degraded outcomes is unacceptable. 

Which leads to a few questions

1) What happens if the target is dramatically too low? 

Most of our links can expect latency between 1-10ms, but they may occasionally go much longer than that. What are the consequences of having a 100ms link configured with a target of 10ms?

2) If interval is dramatically unpredictable is it best to err on the side of under or over estimating?

 The user may select an VPN/exit server of their own choosing, the path to it over the network may change or the exit may be much further away. Both 10ms and 80ms would be sane choices of target depending on factors that may change on the fly. 

Thanks for the feedback! 

-- 
  Justin Kilpatrick
  justin@althea.net

             reply	other threads:[~2019-09-07 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-07 22:42 Justin Kilpatrick [this message]
2019-09-07 23:09 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-09-07 23:31   ` Justin Kilpatrick
2019-09-07 23:42     ` Jonathan Morton
2019-09-08  0:03       ` Justin Kilpatrick
2019-09-08  0:59         ` Jonathan Morton
2019-09-08 14:29           ` Justin Kilpatrick
2019-09-08 17:27             ` Jonathan Morton
2019-09-16 10:21               ` [Cake] cake memory consumption Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-16 12:00                 ` Dave Taht
2019-09-16 12:51                   ` Dave Taht
2019-09-16 13:31                     ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-16 13:22                   ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-16 13:28                     ` Justin Kilpatrick
2019-09-16 13:39                       ` Jonathan Morton
2019-09-16 13:54                         ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-16 14:06                           ` Jonathan Morton
2019-09-17  5:10                             ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-16 13:47                       ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-16 12:08                 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-16 13:25                   ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-16 14:01                     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-17  5:06                       ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-17  5:21                       ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-17  5:31                       ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-17  9:21                         ` Jonathan Morton
2019-09-17  9:55                           ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-17  5:33                       ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-17  9:40                         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-18  7:19                           ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-18  9:53                             ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-18  9:57                               ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-09-18 10:22                                 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-03 17:52               ` [Cake] Fighting bloat in the face of uncertinty Justin Kilpatrick
2019-10-03 18:41                 ` Dave Taht
2019-10-03 19:04                 ` Jonathan Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ac3db996-6769-4e38-b19b-eaa08ac40cd5@www.fastmail.com \
    --to=justin@althea.net \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox