From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@lang.hm>
Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (lang.hm [66.167.227.134])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C7353B260
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed,  3 Aug 2016 15:48:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100])
 by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id u73Jmlt9032639;
 Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:48:47 -0700
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm
To: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
cc: moeller0 <moeller0@gmx.de>, cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
In-Reply-To: <CAOp4FwSKThsgeGFRLsgLbnhSP30fZ2mCgJkM-7MB=SU2kmYk0A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1608031247280.16896@nftneq.ynat.uz>
References: <CAOp4FwRRNfqgOn7pvwQjXPz2k5PZk0xu6w95SZkJJs91y+yaBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <35967373-D9F6-4C0C-8005-787DB8C7B1BB@gmx.de>
 <CAOp4FwQs9-PF=V5zDDMVj_38qmziKkeZECTyX1e8EfChtGm8bA@mail.gmail.com>
 <7ECE7E7A-0310-4DC4-8AC9-29B0F1F2E383@gmx.de>
 <CAOp4FwR-s29C6kbEt-OutZEezXSwVritTZL7bL74+eOH54QZnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOp4FwQuHHq-aX+sBRV7F8oF5y2p6m2gb-kFE+5p3+9JH7H4Cg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOp4FwR_jBG3--9JS-2Sg3f6STd3DsZpfF-M-PGYoP6ojShMOg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F22259A-17C8-4353-B34B-55D7E194D1EB@gmx.de>
 <43469614-F02B-4D9B-8D0E-14D0F4211CF1@gmail.com>
 <0B5FF17F-817F-4993-826D-DE55387D8D91@gmx.de>
 <CAOp4FwR6t=NYEs7SUQsx_tOfYJEGMneNkYpFBva+Cjnfa0hQuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <001B301F-5F3D-4751-A252-ED67021B0BC2@gmx.de>
 <CAOp4FwT433Fv60KA8SswtmoF6jTjfKvTR3k2_GPLOBk7YNWXsA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOp4FwQZgb6rsCAD4tcw4=u8xMH6P=XsAueXrObFMXMgvAyUYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOp4FwS0YRc-wNL-W24+FxYCsStwcSfayCX0wH_GSjVLiaFhvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOp4FwSKThsgeGFRLsgLbnhSP30fZ2mCgJkM-7MB=SU2kmYk0A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Cake] fq_codel on 3g network in Mauritius
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 19:48:58 -0000

On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:

> My conclusion from playing with fq_codel, cake, and txqueuelen 0 hacks
> is that as a pre-requisite, we need to have ISPs that are able to give
> latency with little variations to various places around the earth.
>
> Proving that any QoS on high bandwidth with volatile RTTs is difficult
> due to the "jitter".
>
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong.

I think you have the order wrong. In order for the ISPs to provide consistant 
latencies, we need fq_codel, cake, or similar to be deployed widely, including 
in the ISP equipment so that the latencies are managed sanely when overloads 
hit.

David Lang