Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net>,
	 cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] [Cerowrt-devel] apu2 sqm/htb issue + a minor win for speeding up fq_codel itself
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 14:52:41 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1810051442300.4550@uplift.swm.pp.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1810031728090.4550@uplift.swm.pp.se>

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> I *think*, but am not sure, this box could do a lot more prior to
>> this, but I never really tried. I'm off mostly debugging a babel
>> problem at the moment,
>
> I know for a fact that this box (WRT1200AC) did gigabit at MSS=400 one-way 
> using fq_codel/cake before. I tested it a lot back then. Right now, I am 
> using it as a 250/100 megabit/s machine, and it seems to spend a lot CPU 
> doing that.

I did some new tests. Now I can't reproduce the problem.

I installed 18.06.1 and it'll do single TCP flow MSS 200 (-M 200 in 
iperf3) at 550 megabit/s shown in iperf3, and 87% sirq shown in top on 
WRT1200AC. When I set in/out speed at 800M and enable cake/layer_cake.qos 
then performance drops to ~400 megabit/s with the same packet flow. So the 
performance degradation is only around 20%, which I think is perfectly 
acceptable. I get very similar results with fq_codel and simple.qos.

I also took some power meter readings, WRT1200AC idles as 9.2W and at full 
CPU goes up to 10.4W.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-05 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-04 19:59 [Cake] " Dave Taht
2018-09-04 21:14 ` Dave Taht
2018-09-04 21:16   ` Dave Taht
2018-09-06 17:51     ` Pete Heist
2018-09-06 18:03       ` Dave Taht
2018-10-03 13:56         ` [Cake] [Cerowrt-devel] " Mikael Abrahamsson
2018-10-03 14:44           ` Dave Taht
2018-10-03 14:45             ` Dave Taht
2018-10-03 15:30             ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2018-10-03 16:05               ` Dave Taht
2018-10-03 17:43                 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-10-03 17:53                   ` Dave Taht
2018-10-03 18:32                   ` Jonathan Morton
2018-10-03 20:12                     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-10-05 12:52               ` Mikael Abrahamsson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1810051442300.4550@uplift.swm.pp.se \
    --to=swmike@swm.pp.se \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=pete@heistp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox