From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>,
"ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] [Bloat] The "Some Congestion Experienced" ECN codepoint - a new internet draft -
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:23:14 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903110920550.3161@uplift.swm.pp.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CC550FC8-6025-4063-BD72-1704F54D40FD@gmx.de>
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> How is packet reordering for anybody but the folks responsible for
> operating the "conduits" in any way attractive?
For instance QUIC uses muxing of streams within the same 5 tuple, so it
has use of the transport not holding up information just to preserve
ordering within the 5 tuple stream.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-11 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-10 18:04 [Cake] " Dave Taht
2019-03-10 18:53 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-03-10 19:08 ` [Bloat] " Holland, Jake
2019-03-10 19:30 ` [Cake] " Jonathan Morton
2019-03-11 7:08 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-03-11 7:35 ` Richard Scheffenegger
2019-03-11 7:54 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-03-11 8:59 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-03-11 9:07 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-03-11 9:10 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-03-11 9:47 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-03-11 10:11 ` [Cake] [Codel] " Dave Taht
2019-03-11 16:14 ` Holland, Jake
2019-03-11 15:29 ` [Ecn-sane] " Holland, Jake
2019-03-11 16:13 ` [Cake] " Jonathan Morton
2019-03-11 7:43 ` [Cake] " Sebastian Moeller
2019-03-11 8:23 ` Mikael Abrahamsson [this message]
2019-03-13 4:39 ` David Lang
2019-03-10 21:11 ` Dave Taht
2019-03-10 21:28 ` Dave Taht
2019-03-10 21:49 ` Dave Taht
2019-03-10 22:37 ` [Ecn-sane] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-03-11 3:23 ` [Cake] " Michael Richardson
2019-03-11 3:26 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1903110920550.3161@uplift.swm.pp.se \
--to=swmike@swm.pp.se \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=jholland@akamai.com \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox