From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C6F63CB35; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 02:11:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7D079B0; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:11:56 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1566454316; bh=ag+OcIKwMNjTuW0/R1F4WDFS9tlbXzGWrh3Xp7+zGXE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pFLKsgisSX4mrGTfREF+03IXd5zIHvLoMuJgErNgCrUOuifdzkmUi0L99WlI9j7e3 ycGuk+/M23ppGMKkhwtF0qu8yH8inhY8RLT9WY8oawmPR81kr1ryOxJ1XcoA7VZL7g dz6cKxt2phGl0lS8zEUt9R8xda+A5V1kmIcefGdY= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0869F; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:11:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:11:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Dave Taht cc: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant , Cake List , cerowrt-devel In-Reply-To: <87pnkyea04.fsf@taht.net> Message-ID: References: <30EA2270-684E-48BC-8B57-43F4D8485BE8@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <87pnkyea04.fsf@taht.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Cake] [Cerowrt-devel] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-06 is in last call X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 06:11:58 -0000 On Wed, 21 Aug 2019, Dave Taht wrote: > Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes: > >> Maybe attached patch is more comprehensive? > > Yep! why was diffserv8 5 in the first place? "diffserve8 is 5"? I don't understand. Do you mean 001000? https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3662 3.2. PHB configuration Either a Class Selector (CS) PHB [RFC2474], an Experimental/Local Use (EXP/LU) PHB [RFC2474], or an Assured Forwarding (AF) PHB [RFC2597] may be used as the PHB for the LE traffic aggregate. This document does not specify the exact DSCP to use inside a domain, but instead specifies the necessary properties of the PHB selected by the DSCP. If a CS PHB is used, Class Selector 1 (DSCP=001000) is suggested. So CS1 is the original PHB for LE. However, it has problems and was never really deployed and I was one who pushed for a specific codepoint within 000xxx for LE, that might have a chance to be deployed internet-wide. 000001 seems as good as any. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se