From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dan@coverfire.com>
Received: from alpha.coverfire.com (alpha.coverfire.com [69.41.199.58])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF53F3B2A4
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:10:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from neptune.home (pkt.206.174.packetworks.net [206.174.180.53] (may
 be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)
 by alpha.coverfire.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w6QIAaTo014413
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:10:36 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=coverfire.com;
 s=alpha2011102501; t=1532628636;
 bh=8LKKSBgXslM8K64ygj1uB5jINPm1oeUPDeGdrJm3Jc0=;
 h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=YScGJVefyp8qwDS9fMtFc7xu8DZzDxEI2LCE4CRKyvT5v3bZTYGXEDwraRmWo/FRJ
 ccNTRDjmPLeUl/ROVv1ZRZq6j3RkyperG/quY08OFzSJ55Q9AaW4Q0ffYJe6PXUpQw
 xm+Vdy0kMiEOuAhocfRddov0rPyXNukRUyQjf5n0=
Message-ID: <b38c2a9b6f95ea95653fbcb7d6bb4f38edd37c0d.camel@coverfire.com>
From: Dan Siemon <dan@coverfire.com>
To: Toke =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>, Dave Taht
 <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:10:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87woth28rw.fsf@toke.dk>
References: <1357421162.31089.1531812291583@webmail.strato.de>
 <CAA93jw6xh4rquGA+hSOKjLB_SYObe8p2+-aw_0+wk2YshWiUgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1c323544b3076c0ab31b887d6113f25f572e41ae.camel@coverfire.com>
 <87woth28rw.fsf@toke.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.4 (3.28.4-1.fc28) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 69.41.199.58
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,
 DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU
 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on alpha.coverfire.com
Subject: Re: [Cake]
	=?utf-8?q?Using_cake_to_shape_1000=E2=80=99s_of_users=2E?=
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:10:38 -0000

On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 19:42 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Dan Siemon <dan@coverfire.com> writes:
> 
> > I haven't had time to try Cake in this context yet but hope to get
> > to
> > that in the next couple months. I believe this will require one
> > Cake
> > instance per-subscriber like we do with FQ-CoDel today.
> 
> Yup, currently it would. It might be possible to extend CAKE's
> architecture to not require this, though. If you are interested in
> pursuing this in the future, let us know; having someone actually
> using
> it would be quite useful if we were to pursue development of this :)

Yes, I'm very interested in this. A single QDisc would simplify things
quite a bit and hopefully be a perf win.

I'm happy to test this locally and with real subscribers once it is
stable enough.