From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-x236.google.com (mail-wr0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E75223B2A4 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 09:30:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wr0-x236.google.com with SMTP id g10so37230965wrg.2 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 06:30:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MJAZlTknQxs2DcIPyxaOXUBJXA56V+QnVrUDnD+DeaM=; b=uLxpMfZXa0Sz4J7eePPURuSLbVn7FfJq1BG5XxCWSPgyK9K8Gmg86O3dHLrjaz9mIS /LkncKMZJ/MP71rrcKBcQKH1SqHc5CdpJ5nTjfFk/YMYDpYEIkMAGoTgMdPVisJ/+1bZ uTZqoy6hFWGQkQ7O/eVsWngsGgjM10KaBsRjjos/ZyqNmdn5v1VcCgR2jByAfNrGrQZ8 rAybgy/xIRvJXA1McYxZVIvPKtEu52xOl3T/6vzxJU3E/MKg6FARKx8cCEPLxBYFTtT6 zjLBkJChD+aTThdeYFJKYIgrQSdIVKt/YMIzVBn4lQyCkPAycnBLdlzGtc7WTf0Kkvmk Il6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MJAZlTknQxs2DcIPyxaOXUBJXA56V+QnVrUDnD+DeaM=; b=qA2gr8Al6xq3JRwIYT6AoS8wmLSWjwR25u89w/aMAHTRiiT3Wv+UHJbul75XcdUr1f b6G7F3f6ektVP4XCcqtUWxc+3NEMJPY8aM3Rm6+h78HP7w8SGE+FFxtF+0CT8P6ac7NJ /XYrO2cf/3gbKH+Oswcmde/N9BHVessr1eezIDb2AnhrSCpH2SWm9BFxzAhDGKRw1oTk QXNT60q3/pII0ctUheJxg0wtFVPxg6X9qgAfxcjJ9IycJUNTroTk69Bm3EMujOalQCFV FHJ2P+RgLsRTZZYGEoN4CTnSpxSJJQAEofI1wzrxdbWWcFF4pb7URy/St+sBOYwegJM5 28nA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n+J74UNexRW9p6FB5V0Ao29uobaWR0NoNnwdAtNtb514Tz0UEbT4An2E6oU0RPwg== X-Received: by 10.223.179.15 with SMTP id j15mr9851507wrd.159.1488119455790; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 06:30:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (53.218.125.91.dyn.plus.net. [91.125.218.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s26sm16148970wra.66.2017.02.26.06.30.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Feb 2017 06:30:55 -0800 (PST) To: Jonathan Morton Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <5E17AA80-FF83-4CEA-A1C8-BF12B0031CBD@gmail.com> From: Andy Furniss Message-ID: Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 14:30:55 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5E17AA80-FF83-4CEA-A1C8-BF12B0031CBD@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cake] Putting cake under dsmark on ingress ifb X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 14:30:57 -0000 Jonathan Morton wrote: > >> On 26 Feb, 2017, at 15:41, Andy Furniss wrote: >> >> This works in the sense that I can now get tcpdump on a PC on the >> lan to show incoming icmp with tos 0xb8. >> >> So I try to add cake under dsmark ini the hope that it sees icmp as ef >> but it doesn't, icmp goes to best effort. > > I suspect packets are queuing in cake first and only then going through dsmark. What happens if you reverse the nesting? tc qdisc add dev ifb0 handle 1:0 root cake bandwidth 60mbit raw overhead 34 diffserv4 tc qdisc add dev ifb0 handle 2:0 parent 1:0 dsmark indices 64 RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported Going to be AFK till this evening - will try more random stuff later.