Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dave Täht" <dave@taht.net>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake strange behaviour
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:59:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0f5faf9-9334-a1e8-e261-a635efdb531f@taht.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5789FFEF.9010408@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>

I would repeat the same test with htb+fq_codel.

On 7/16/16 11:35 AM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> Encountering some behaviour that I don't understand.  Line is a 40/10
> cake limited to 39000/9840. Overheads 12, 'dual-dsthosts' in ingress,
> 'dual-srcshosts' on engress - limiting the on the WAN line. Take a look
> at my ping response graph
> 
> http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/share/9822cb5160582fa6abee29b60d807766-16-07-2016.html
> 
> 
> Around 20:30 I fired up a windows machine that was behind on its updates
> so it generated a bit of ingress traffic.  Note the comparatively high
> latency (40ms) and stupidly high ping packet loss (50%)  The 3-5ms
> steady (blue) latency you can see is a system backup (so egress traffic)
> running till around 23:00.
> 
> The really strange bit is that cake stats show it has only dropped 10
> (yes 10!) packets.
> 
> I'm not the only person encountering 'interesting' behaviour with regard
> to windows updates inducing high latency and high packet loss.  It's as
> if cake weren't there managing flows and this is the ISP's rate limiter
> in action.
> 
> Kevin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-16 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-16  9:35 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2016-07-16 10:59 ` Dave Täht [this message]
2016-07-16 11:53   ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2016-07-16 12:44     ` Dave Täht
2016-07-16 13:37     ` Sebastian Moeller
2016-07-16 16:25 ` Jonathan Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d0f5faf9-9334-a1e8-e261-a635efdb531f@taht.net \
    --to=dave@taht.net \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox