From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E7173B2A4 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:56:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C538D25 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:56:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap9 ([10.202.2.59]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:56:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=althea.net; h= mime-version:message-id:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s= fm1; bh=VrFBMAkqqriPeSiIHK+iiq3S1jY0YoSs8/wdTMgtPb4=; b=t+ROj6lI 06NRTJOPECMa2VkJUL/s6iZFkJM7NbS58oLAsiYR5XJO7QCa9UGaRPJhp6GlDuG2 xU5jAINYVhNNhO0N27bFoUtjE6HxVMhwL1W9b4IhNEC7RZRsPApYs0bpgLOzBMIY /guDgfOiStdFXc9uBWM6vbDnakQUC+u3rRBM+9puBb6wVBm+pZFRH0pm4lsDjcOf 3/7tRZ7hGBCe+15D/+qqfb1x6Ow3Xf64vSKLLFM+GerBvseI6bYwfeEFhXCX+iFS 2WNg9j7VNd/SUX0Ki5iCkYbJ527mN3gQqoJycWwcc+k2IE6+AbejwTv6RPxb2+bU 7WgZUl/WCgdJHA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=VrFBMAkqqriPeSiIHK+iiq3S1jY0Y oSs8/wdTMgtPb4=; b=GVkmfuakmDMNksb9N34QFJ85sICUdPJVHdcI/GJF+47Hi qUYwxy3cDGJpIWZo/fR3afifWiTIaLgFT8fJ57ZHsLV66VJMATiFu1ySY2e9D2Y5 Llqpg1/W0UkBgb8Agzd+92zW3lB7SZb1K+HVAh7ZMHvUF88Nby7tCfNa8Ue54tcB 2/TsAkPryglwhFmJZquVsqkJTWEron7VaVisKq+qaOELl8ZHEZd/IZ1/x9a3jDZv VBt1FSpLudwR41yYcuzZ1pLDik7Bbx0Mxe5n6bau17hEIS0KlZSpPJMD/4SeGC9+ M4olPSgwWI7YGpuM44kTpiwkhC6nTXuRQISJtXzlA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrheefgdeljecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkfffhvffutgesthdtredtre ertdenucfhrhhomhepfdfluhhsthhinhcumfhilhhprghtrhhitghkfdcuoehjuhhsthhi nhesrghlthhhvggrrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedthfeujefhledvueette elgeduteehuedtkefgudeuveekteelvdegieetteekjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjuhhsthhinhesrghlthhhvggrrdhnvg ht X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4A07A1C07D7; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:56:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-92-g11c785d-fm-20200721.004-g11c785d5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:56:28 -0400 From: "Justin Kilpatrick" To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain Subject: [Cake] diffserv3 vs diffserv4 X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:56:51 -0000 "sqm-scripts used 3 tiers of priority pretty successfully as does free.fr. - de-prioritization seems a good idea, prioritization not so much." This is the best comment on why diffserv3 is the default that I could find on bufferbloat.net. I'm interested in hearing about what data (anecdotes welcome) lead to this conclusion. -- Justin Kilpatrick justin@althea.net