From: Andy Furniss <adf.lists@gmail.com>
To: Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] overheads or rate calculation changed?
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:54:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d772fb51-7f8f-62bc-990b-fb1ac46ab19e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31d49a5d-02a2-3dc8-a455-52d453b83bdf@gmail.com>
Andy Furniss wrote:
> Been running a cake cobolt from april for some time using
>
> tc qdisc add dev ppp0 handle 1:0 root cake bandwidth 19690kbit raw
> overhead 34 diffserv4 dual-srchost nat rtt 200ms
>
> tc -s qdisc ls dev ppp0 (ppp0 is pppoe)
>
> qdisc cake 1: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 19690Kbit diffserv4 dual-srchost
> nat rtt 200.0ms noatm overhead 56 via-ethernet
>
> Which is backed off a couple of kbit and tests well (overhead 33 + udp
> flood is over limit)
>
> With current cobalt + current tc the same command is under rate - I
> don't know if its rate calculation or overheads calc changed.
>
> overhead 20 (-14) is still under but overhead 12 (-22) is over.
>
> I was hoping one of those would be correct, but no.
>
> Any ideas/known changes?
Bisected to -
f33c4d6a08cb21374ce52fc1438a8531bc84bcbe is the first bad commit
commit f33c4d6a08cb21374ce52fc1438a8531bc84bcbe
Author: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Nov 22 16:21:13 2017 -0800
refactor cake_advance_shaper and ack_filter
cake_advance_shaper now returns a modified len argument to
reflect cake_overhead.
skb_ack_filter variable replaced with ack
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-21 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-18 20:32 Andy Furniss
2017-12-21 0:54 ` Andy Furniss [this message]
2017-12-22 6:38 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-22 7:58 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE3e-CbJ8X_Bpu3AhwbVmq-yD89HGe7rSNMTYqj+KSaBUg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-12-22 10:00 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-22 12:58 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2017-12-22 15:55 ` Dave Taht
2017-12-22 23:38 ` Andy Furniss
2017-12-23 9:41 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-12-23 9:59 ` Andy Furniss
2017-12-23 12:55 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-12-23 13:11 ` Ryan Mounce
2017-12-23 14:21 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-12-23 21:03 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-12-23 21:20 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-24 10:34 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2017-12-24 10:39 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-24 10:46 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2017-12-24 12:19 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-12-24 12:14 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-01-06 20:44 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-06 22:46 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-01-07 0:33 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-07 8:19 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-01-07 15:21 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d772fb51-7f8f-62bc-990b-fb1ac46ab19e@gmail.com \
--to=adf.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox