Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Furniss <adf.lists@gmail.com>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] flow isolation for ISPs
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:48:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6ca48bc-4a7d-d991-fde7-5d28ced3015b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8E96329F-A57D-49C7-A7EE-60BD165B4D5C@gmail.com>

Pete Heist wrote:

> Cake is not a requirement yet. I like it for several of its
> attributes (good performance with high numbers of flows, and also
> when “over-limiting”, which I’ll explain more in my next round of
> point-to-point WiFi results).

Would be nicer for your users though?

I mean in the sense that if the "outer" hash could be done on some mark
then the inner hash on connection as normal then they would get more
than a fifo, which seems to be how current solutions are heading.

TBH, though I don't even get your set up - I mean is WISP like some
giant lan, or does anyone that asks get a real IP, do subscribers
normally have more than one access point? Just curious.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-06 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-06  8:27 Pete Heist
2017-04-06  8:39 ` David Lang
2017-04-06  8:48   ` Pete Heist
2017-04-06  8:57 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-04-06  9:04   ` Pete Heist
2017-04-06 10:26   ` Andy Furniss
2017-04-06  9:11 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-04-06  9:26   ` Pete Heist
2017-04-07  8:13     ` Pete Heist
2017-04-07  8:28       ` Jonathan Morton
2017-04-07  9:37         ` Pete Heist
2017-04-07 11:13           ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-04-07 11:42             ` Pete Heist
2017-04-08  6:16           ` Pete Heist
2017-04-07 10:56         ` John Sager
2017-04-06  9:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-04-06 10:26   ` Pete Heist
2017-04-06 10:50     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-04-06 11:34       ` Pete Heist
2017-04-06 12:14         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-04-06 13:30           ` Pete Heist
2017-04-06 13:42             ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-04-06 13:50               ` Pete Heist
2017-04-06 14:41               ` Dave Taht
2017-04-06 12:48     ` Andy Furniss [this message]
2017-04-06 13:19 Konstantin Shalygin
     [not found] <mailman.340.1491486631.3609.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2017-04-06 14:18 ` Pete Heist
2017-04-06 15:41   ` Andy Furniss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e6ca48bc-4a7d-d991-fde7-5d28ced3015b@gmail.com \
    --to=adf.lists@gmail.com \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox