Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dave Täht" <dave@taht.net>
To: Neil Shepperd <nshepperd@gmail.com>, cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] cake for net-next 4.8
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:09:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eace2e75-c6b0-d90a-8ac6-243d49462444@taht.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFnvbVMaft6_0hMWYtnWQp-0EBN2OmAvYmPoS=9pRrH+fY4csA@mail.gmail.com>



On 10/3/16 2:17 PM, Neil Shepperd wrote:
> Gmail spam team got back to me; they have apparently "fixed the
> problem", which I guess means messages here should stop being marked as
> spam soon. Because gmail's spam filters are top secret business, I
> couldn't tell you anything else :)

It is great to have friends (in places high and low). Thank you!

That said, I almost, but not quite, got the dkim stuff working the other
day - not that I can intuit that was the source of the problem!

> 
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 at 17:10 Dave Täht <dave@taht.net
> <mailto:dave@taht.net>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     On 9/30/16 1:37 PM, Neil Shepperd wrote:
>     > Disabling ipv6 (at least in the mail server, in outgoing direction) is
>     > probably the easiest option...
> 
>     It looks like the simplest thing I could do to allow inbound while
>     stopping outbound ipv6 would be to:
> 
>     /etc/postfix/main.cf <http://main.cf>:
>         smtp_bind_address6 = ::1
> 
> 
>     > I see on most messages here DKIM-Signature headers apparently from
>     > gmail: "v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com
>     <http://gmail.com>
>     > <http://gmail.com>; s=20120113;". These signatures are failing because
>     > of the added message footer. No sign of a DKIM-Signature
>     > for lists.bufferbloat.net <http://lists.bufferbloat.net>
>     <http://lists.bufferbloat.net>. You'd need to
>     > set that up in the list MTA.
> 
>     Honestly my "email-fu" has declined considerably in recent years.
>     Despite the apparent simplicity of this idea, my brain just crashed
>     multiple times on setting it up with postfix + mailman 2.
> 
>     And thank you for poking so deeply into this, I was A) really annoyed by
>     the bloat-list-as-spam thing and B) clueless.
> 
>     > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 at 15:42 Dave Täht <dave@taht.net
>     <mailto:dave@taht.net>
>     > <mailto:dave@taht.net <mailto:dave@taht.net>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     On 9/30/16 1:02 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>     >     > Neil Shepperd <nshepperd@gmail.com
>     <mailto:nshepperd@gmail.com> <mailto:nshepperd@gmail.com
>     <mailto:nshepperd@gmail.com>>>
>     >     writes:
>     >     >
>     >     >> I think I have now accumulated enough spam/nonspam
>     classified emails
>     >     >> to make a statistically signification observation: it seems
>     like all
>     >     >> emails classified as spam from these lists were send from ipv6:
>     >     >>
>     >     >> SPF: PASS with IP 2600:3c03:0:0:f03c:91ff:fe61:86ce
>     >     >>
>     >     >> All emails from bufferbloat.net <http://bufferbloat.net>
>     <http://bufferbloat.net> lists
>     >     are failing DKIM (because of the
>     >     >> mailing list footer breaking the DKIM signature) which
>     might be worth
>     >     >> fixing, and failing DMARC because all mailing lists fails DMARC
>     >     >> (however google does not have a strict DMARC policy so that
>     shouldn't
>     >     >> matter, I hope).
>     >     >>
>     >     >> By the way, it's not just you, either. I have emails from
>     others on
>     >     >> these lists in my spam folder.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> The distinguishing factor seems to be whether the email was
>     sent from
>     >     >> the lists.bufferbloat.net <http://lists.bufferbloat.net>
>     <http://lists.bufferbloat.net> ipv6
>     >     address. Unless this address
>     >     >> corresponds to some kind of tunnel broker possibly also used by
>     >     >> spammers, I can only assume this is some kind of bug (after
>     all, it
>     >     >> was spf validated so the address shouldn't matter at that
>     point?).
>     >     >
>     >     > Indeed, gmail requires extra measures for IPv6:
>     >     > https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126 (scroll down to
>     >     "Additional
>     >     > guidelines for IPv6").
>     >     >
>     >     > Fixing DKIM might be worthwhile :)
>     >
>     >     But it passes the spf check?? And the reverse lookup is correct.
>     >
>     >     How about I just disable ipv6?
>     >
>     >     Have no idea why dkim doesn't work.
>     >
>     >     >
>     >     > -Toke
>     >     > _______________________________________________
>     >     > Cake mailing list
>     >     > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
>     <mailto:Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>     <mailto:Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>>
>     >     > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>     >     >
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     Cake mailing list
>     >     Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>     <mailto:Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>>
>     >     https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>     >
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-04 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-25 18:30 Dave Taht
2016-09-27 14:38 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-09-27 16:04   ` Dave Taht
2016-09-27 16:13     ` Jonathan Morton
2016-09-29 23:22       ` Neil Shepperd
2016-09-30  8:02         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2016-09-30 13:08           ` Neil Shepperd
2016-09-30 19:42           ` Dave Täht
2016-09-30 20:37             ` Neil Shepperd
2016-09-30 21:10               ` Dave Täht
2016-10-03 21:17                 ` Neil Shepperd
2016-10-04  6:33                   ` Henning Rogge
2016-10-04 16:09                   ` Dave Täht [this message]
2016-10-20  5:56                     ` Neil Shepperd
2016-09-27 17:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-09-27 18:18   ` Dave Taht
2016-09-27 18:56     ` Jonathan Morton
2016-09-27 19:29       ` Dave Taht
2016-09-27 19:54         ` Jonathan Morton
2016-09-28 23:26       ` Dave Taht
2016-09-28 23:34         ` Jonathan Morton
2016-09-29 20:43           ` Andrew Shewmaker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eace2e75-c6b0-d90a-8ac6-243d49462444@taht.net \
    --to=dave@taht.net \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=nshepperd@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox