Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alec Robertson <alecrobertson13@gmail.com>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Beating bufferbloat
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 23:22:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <etPan.571bf5be.7e58e59c.318@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <etPan.571bd473.43735a3d.318@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5456 bytes --]

Dear All,

I’ve realised that I have been responding to Kevin rather than to the mailing list - my bad!

I think I will purchase a Linksys WRT1900ACS as it seems to be fairly well regarded and is easily accessible in the UK.

How do I go about setting up Cake on it?

-- 
Alec Robertson

On 23 April 2016 at 9:00:52 pm, Alec Robertson (alecrobertson13@gmail.com) wrote:

Dear Kevin,

I did look at the Linksys WRT1200AC but it seems to get some rather poor reviews on Amazon?

-- 
Alec Robertson

On 23 April 2016 at 8:58:02 pm, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant (kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk) wrote:



On 23/04/2016 20:42, Alec Robertson wrote:
Dear Kevin,

That’s very useful thanks.

You say the TP-LINK Archer C7 should just be okay. What could I get that I know will last me for a long time? What’s got good WiFi range too?
The honest answer is I've absolutely no idea and I'm in that dilemma myself.  There's a remake of the linksys WRT range (WRT1200????) that apparently is very powerful, I guess the issue is how far along OpenWrt is.  I might have the wrong end of hte stick but I think Dave Taht may have something working.

Apologies, I'm not really a mine of information.


I’m using powerline at the moment but fed up with it disconnecting. I think it is probably the TP-LINK adaptors I am using (known issue apparently) but wiring up the house is unpractical at the moment. I don’t think there is a better solution really.

-- 
Alec Robertson

On 23 April 2016 at 8:00:00 pm, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant (kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk) wrote:

Hi Alec,

I'm not familiar with TalkTalk but they sound like they do similar
things to Sky - Sky just need a 'login ID' as part of the DHCP request
packet (which funnily enough are the PPPoA/E login details)

In terms of speed sacrifice, erm, none really. I've set 40mpbs incoming
and 9990kbps for outgoing on a 40000/9999 link as reported by the
modem. Probably critically I've set the packet overheads to 12, and I
now can't remember why... there's an on-wire vlan tag (4 bytes) but the
reason for the other 8 have fallen out of the brain cell.

I've a semi-regular backup job overnight that on a bad day overruns into
the day - a week or so ago it ran for something like 2 days and I had
absolutely no idea - thinkbroadband's ping monitor was registering
something like an extra 5mS latency over the baseline, peaks were
something like 25mS - backup stats and openwrt's stats package were
registering the full 10mbps uplink in use during that time.

Does that help?

Kevin




On 23/04/16 19:40, Alec Robertson wrote:
> Dear Kevin,
>
> I am on TalkTalk which uses IPoE, so no PPPoE use at all, as far as I
> know. I certainly haven’t ever configured login details.
>
> How much speed do you have to sacrifice on your connection to
> eliminate bufferbloat?
>
> --
> Alec Robertson
>
> On 23 April 2016 at 10:46:35 am, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> (kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk <mailto:kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>)
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alec,
>>
>> A brief appearance from me whilst I have a spare few seconds.
>>
>> Not stupid!
>>
>> There’s an obvious question: Why are Billion still shipping buffer
>> bloated devices? Have they been sent graphs/demos/logs of how their
>> kit is faulty?
>>
>> To offer some hopefully constructive pointers: For FTTC service I’m
>> guessing you’ll be using the Billion as a vdsl modem. Who’s the ISP?
>> AFAIK anyone other than Sky will need to run PPPoE and hence hit the
>> 1492 MTU restriction *unless* the Billion supports mini jumbo frames
>> on the ethernet side and the PPPoE MTU extension (the rfc number
>> escapes the brain at the moment) Sky don’t use PPP and just run
>> ethernet frames over PTM…..the way it should be. The incoming
>> packets from ISP to you are policed at something close to sync rate,
>> this is part of the BT specification. The uplink of course can be as
>> bloated as hell ;-)
>>
>> I use an Archer C7 with BT’s equally horrendously bloated HG612 vdsl
>> modem on a 40/10 link with sky as my isp. In terms of CPU usage it’s
>> about 1% per megabit so a full 40/10 uses around 55% cpu, I think
>> there’s enough for your 60/20…just.
>> https://middling.me.uk/blog/2015/03/customising-openwrt-to-my-needs/
>> offers further advice which I found useful.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 22 Apr 2016, at 23:01, Alec Robertson <alecrobertson13@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:alecrobertson13@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I’ve been out of the bufferbloat game for a while and want to try
>>> and beat it once again.
>>>
>>> I’ve got an FTTC connection (UK) which I get around 60Mbps on but
>>> with horrible bufferbloat on my Billion 8800NL. What router should I
>>> get that can run OpenWRT and handle this connection? Do the newest
>>> builds of OpenWRT have cake built-in now via sqm-scripts or would I
>>> need to install this manually. If so, how would I do this?
>>>
>>> Would appreciate any help and apologies if I come off in any way stupid.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alec Robertson
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cake mailing list
>>> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>>



--   
Thanks,

Kevin@Darbyshire-Bryant.me.uk
M: +44 7947 355344 H: +44 1256 478597

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 11437 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-23 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-22 21:59 Alec Robertson
2016-04-22 22:01 ` Alec Robertson
2016-04-22 22:26   ` Dave Taht
2016-04-23  9:46   ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
     [not found]     ` <etPan.571bc183.1196373c.318@gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <571BC61C.4070008@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
     [not found]         ` <etPan.571bd013.59df9c16.318@gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <571BD3BC.2090405@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
     [not found]             ` <etPan.571bd473.43735a3d.318@gmail.com>
2016-04-23 22:22               ` Alec Robertson [this message]
2016-04-24 10:37                 ` Arie
2016-04-25 16:01                   ` Dave Taht
2016-04-25 16:59                     ` Dave Taht
2016-04-29 14:58                   ` Dave Taht
2016-05-01 12:18                     ` Alec Robertson
2016-05-01 13:27                       ` Sebastian Moeller
2016-05-01 18:23 Alec Robertson
2016-05-01 21:30 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2016-05-01 21:32   ` Alec Robertson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=etPan.571bf5be.7e58e59c.318@gmail.com \
    --to=alecrobertson13@gmail.com \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox