From: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
To: <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] diffserv based on firewall mark
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:10:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3b17ec1-e6cf-1986-7c8c-2470279ac426@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7M3AsTqD7OQ0XFXvYL86YBozywBnOyE4xVtZcestbcVw@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/10/16 11:21, Dave Taht wrote:
> I still defend the idea of the diffserv "squash" option cake once had.
> It was essentially RFC compliant, simple to use, and because iptables
> was too late on inbound, needed, no matter the layer violation.
Yeah I liked it too, so much I even thought about having a wash value
per tin....which is a bit mad. It wouldn't be that hard to revert the
commit though and bring it up to date with the latest triple-isolate
related tweaks should someone need it and be able to compile a bit of code.
cough cough cough, nothing to see here
https://github.com/kdarbyshirebryant/sch_cake/tree/squashwash
https://github.com/kdarbyshirebryant/tc-adv/tree/squashwash
nothing at all. Move along. Oooh look squirrels!
KDB
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-12 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-12 5:52 ching lu
2016-10-12 7:26 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-10-12 8:11 ` ching lu
2016-10-12 9:10 ` moeller0
2016-10-12 9:35 ` ching lu
2016-10-12 10:05 ` moeller0
[not found] ` <CACHiF8D=iF4cww0QRC-UODpvC=oRmchP6jp3tT2A-=9M2piy+g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CACHiF8BH2Pfx7de8Se6pv83tHUx1enLt_pc1MBp=uSs2mD=kYA@mail.gmail.com>
2016-10-12 10:17 ` ching lu
2016-10-12 10:21 ` Dave Taht
2016-10-12 11:10 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant [this message]
2016-10-12 12:07 ` moeller0
2016-10-12 12:04 ` moeller0
2016-10-12 12:40 ` ching lu
2016-10-12 13:07 ` moeller0
2016-10-13 0:08 ` ching lu
2016-10-12 15:36 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-10-12 20:19 ` Sebastian Moeller
2016-10-13 0:19 ` ching lu
2016-10-13 0:26 ` David Lang
2016-10-12 19:42 ` Y
2016-10-12 19:59 ` Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3b17ec1-e6cf-1986-7c8c-2470279ac426@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
--to=kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox