From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: dave.taht@gmail.com,cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] some comprehensive arm64 w/cake results
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 01:25:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ly9dlv.s15qm0.0-qmf@smtp.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5nDw_vArfxpevWbuLrj9HiLTczepEBL2vJxj=MGmrf8g@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, 18 September 2023, Dave Taht via Cake wrote:
> A huge thanks to dave seddon for buckling down and doing some comprehensive
> testing of a variety of arm64 gear!
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HxIU_TEBI6xG9jRHlr8rzyyxFEN43zMcJXUFlRuhiUI/edit#heading=h.bpvv3vr500nw
I'm really not sure it's valid to compare fq_codel on default settings (equivalent to rtt 100ms) to Cake on 1ms and 3ms rtt settings. At such tight settings you're asking Cake to hold the queue down to a fifth of a millisecond, and we already know from L4S that's a fool's errand. The internal overheads of the Linux kernel will give you delays of that order already.
At least include a run with Cake similarly on rtt 100ms, which is the default and what most Internet facing CPE would run. You may well find that throughput improves significantly.
- Jonathan Morton
Sent from my Sailfish device
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-18 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-18 1:05 Dave Taht
2023-09-18 1:25 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2023-09-18 16:57 ` David P. Reed
2023-09-18 19:50 ` dave seddon
2023-09-18 20:24 ` David P. Reed
2023-09-18 22:07 ` Jonathan Morton
2023-09-28 11:44 ` Jonathan Morton
2023-09-28 12:15 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-28 12:33 ` Jonathan Morton
2023-09-28 12:56 ` David Lang
2023-09-28 13:08 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-28 13:19 ` David Lang
2023-09-28 13:27 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-13 15:59 ` dave seddon
2023-10-13 17:25 ` dave seddon
2023-10-15 15:11 ` dave seddon
2023-10-15 15:52 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-15 16:24 ` dave seddon
2023-10-15 20:29 ` David P. Reed
2023-10-16 3:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2023-10-15 15:53 ` Dave Taht
2023-10-23 20:31 ` dave seddon
2023-10-23 20:35 ` dave seddon
2023-10-24 16:27 ` dave seddon
2023-10-24 21:35 ` dave seddon
2023-10-24 22:06 ` Dave Taht
2023-09-18 22:13 ` Jonathan Morton
2023-09-18 22:52 ` dave seddon
2023-09-18 23:08 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ly9dlv.s15qm0.0-qmf@smtp.gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox