From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@lang.hm>
Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (lang.hm [66.167.227.134])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B78E3BA8E
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:36:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dlang-laptop ([10.2.0.162])
 by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id vAHJahsU005669;
 Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:36:43 -0800
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:36:43 -0800 (PST)
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
X-X-Sender: dlang@dlang-laptop
To: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
In-Reply-To: <87o9o027g5.fsf@nemesis.taht.net>
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1711171134500.5973@qynat-yncgbc>
References: <87o9o027g5.fsf@nemesis.taht.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 209 2017-03-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Cake] checkpatch and cake
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:36:45 -0000

Remember that the upstream folks regard checkpatch as advice, not a rule, so 
don't go overboard changing other code to comply with checkpatch (or if you do 
make a bunch of changes to other code, make it a separate commit, before your 
functional changes)

David Lang