From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>,
"Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>,
Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] [Bloat] The "Some Congestion Experienced" ECN codepoint - a new internet draft -
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 21:39:42 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1903122137430.6242@qynat-yncgbc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CC550FC8-6025-4063-BD72-1704F54D40FD@gmx.de>
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> How is packet reordering for anybody but the folks responsible for operating
> the "conduits" in any way attractive?
It's more that not worrying about maintaining the order, and just moving the
packets as fast as possible reduces the overhead.
The majority of the time, packets will be in order, but race conditions and
corner cases are allowed to forward packets out of order rather than having the
delay some packets to maintain the order.
David Lang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-13 4:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-10 18:04 [Cake] " Dave Taht
2019-03-10 18:53 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-03-10 19:08 ` [Bloat] " Holland, Jake
2019-03-10 19:30 ` [Cake] " Jonathan Morton
2019-03-11 7:08 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-03-11 7:35 ` Richard Scheffenegger
2019-03-11 7:54 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-03-11 8:59 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-03-11 9:07 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-03-11 9:10 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-03-11 9:47 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-03-11 10:11 ` [Cake] [Codel] " Dave Taht
2019-03-11 16:14 ` Holland, Jake
2019-03-11 15:29 ` [Ecn-sane] " Holland, Jake
2019-03-11 16:13 ` [Cake] " Jonathan Morton
2019-03-11 7:43 ` [Cake] " Sebastian Moeller
2019-03-11 8:23 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-03-13 4:39 ` David Lang [this message]
2019-03-10 21:11 ` Dave Taht
2019-03-10 21:28 ` Dave Taht
2019-03-10 21:49 ` Dave Taht
2019-03-10 22:37 ` [Ecn-sane] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-03-11 3:23 ` [Cake] " Michael Richardson
2019-03-11 3:26 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1903122137430.6242@qynat-yncgbc \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=jholland@akamai.com \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox