From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38D4E3B29E for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 00:24:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from dlang-laptop (unknown [10.2.0.162]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5066FE9367; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 21:24:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 21:24:23 -0800 (PST) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@dlang-laptop To: xnor cc: David Lang , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: <5d192438-aaec-fe04-88dc-a9fac1abc698@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <5d192438-aaec-fe04-88dc-a9fac1abc698@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 209 2017-03-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Cake] bringing up a new router/connection X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 05:24:24 -0000 I made the mistake of installing htop and now even after uninstalling the htop package, still have the htop display :-( I've moved on to the turris omni, hich is supposed to be pretty good performance. Download is still on the slow side, but I'm now throttling it with cake to around 300M, but I'm still getting horrible upload performance (10M-15M instead of 35M), processing power doesn't explain the upload issue. David Lang On Thu, 4 Feb 2021, xnor wrote: > Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 02:11:32 +0100 > From: xnor > To: David Lang , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > Subject: Re: [Cake] bringing up a new router/connection > > Hello David, > > connect to the router over ssh and run top. What's the top load line(s) with > usr, sys, ... softirq look like during a download speedtest? > > Anyway, according to some review it should be able to route about 700-800 > Mbps WAN->LAN, with the original firmware. This is probably only possible > with hardware offloading. > Even if there was no bottleneck I wouldn't expect getting even remotely close > to that with cake also on ingress. > > The only device I have to compare to yours is a smaller TP-Link router with > the same routing performance but a QCA9563 (750 MHz single core) and I > wouldn't use that for anything above 100 Mbps. > > > >