From: noreply@github.com
To: cerowrt-commits@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [dtaht/deBloat] 5e9fe7: Start at latency under load test and related suppo...
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 03:41:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111231114153.21A48426BC@smtp1.rs.github.com> (raw)
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/dtaht/deBloat
Commit: 5e9fe71c15df860860683f161e962aa9a530f383
https://github.com/dtaht/deBloat/commit/5e9fe71c15df860860683f161e962aa9a530f383
Author: Dave Taht <d@taht.net>
Date: 2011-12-31 (Sat, 31 Dec 2011)
Changed paths:
M .gitignore
A test/ab.gnu
M test/db.lua
M test/db.sql
A test/editor.lua
A test/gnuplot.org
A test/latency_load.lua
A test/multiplot.gnu
M test/netperf.lua
A test/ping2.gnu
A test/pingplot.gnu
M test/pingplotter.lua
A test/random.gnu
A test/testtikz.gnu
A test/tree.lua
Log Message:
-----------
Start at latency under load test and related support
Some do top down design, some bottom up,
some do both at the same time and try to meet in the middle.
My own rule is if I need a piece of code more than 3 times,
make it general purpose. I work in four phases when working
without a specification, but understanding the task at hand.
1) top down,bottom up,middle out
2) get something that works
3) tag it as a working version
then refactor, refactor, refactor.
Git has changed how I work significantly in that I do like
to make commits as often as I can. Unlike some, I like
to see the mistakes I made, reflected in the repository
so I don't make them again.
I am suffering mostly from not grokking how oo works in lua,
as well as argv handling. I have thoughts towards making the
testbed work at the command line, in emacs, and on the web, and
that complicates matters somewhat.
I'm not happy with gnuplot. Nor do I want to be dependent
on google charts - as cool as they are - because most of the
time I'm offline while doing a test.
* Added a bunch of gnuplot examples to refer to
* Revised sql handling somewhat
* revised db somewhat
* wrote stubs for netperf, editing, iperf, ab
* wrote stub for latency under load test
reply other threads:[~2011-12-31 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111231114153.21A48426BC@smtp1.rs.github.com \
--to=noreply@github.com \
--cc=cerowrt-commits@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox