From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.rs.github.com (smtp1-ext.rs.github.com [207.97.227.250]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00122200377 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 03:02:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from github.com (sh1.rs.github.com [172.17.1.41]) by smtp1.rs.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97C14252A for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 03:02:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 03:02:20 -0800 To: cerowrt-commits@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: [dtaht/deBloat] 579447: Wireless QFQ tests. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <20120102110220.D97C14252A@smtp1.rs.github.com> From: noreply@github.com X-BeenThere: cerowrt-commits@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development commits for the cerowrt project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:02:22 -0000 Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/dtaht/deBloat Commit: 579447684ffdb512a9168b86b0515ae38335ab26 https://github.com/dtaht/deBloat/commit/579447684ffdb512a9168b86b0515ae38335ab26 Author: Dave Taht Date: 2012-01-02 (Mon, 02 Jan 2012) Changed paths: A test/results/wirelessqfqvspfifo.org Log Message: ----------- Wireless QFQ tests. The data is REALLY noisy and I need to run for a much longer time, and come up with a good way to plot the results. That said, QFQ has an average ping time of about 70ms vs 110 for pfifo_fast. I suspect that using two (thoroughly debloated) ath9k cards will work better - the laptop has an iwl which is known to be problematic. And I need to vary some more variables.