Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages Commit: 82ef2faf9b711d6b929e7eaa545d8aa4fe61ebf8 https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages/commit/82ef2faf9b711d6b929e7eaa545d8aa4fe61ebf8 Author: Dave Taht Date: 2012-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 2012) Changed paths: M net/babelz/Makefile R net/babelz/patches/001-babeld-prio.patch Log Message: ----------- Update babel 1.3.1, add patch for ECN This updates babel to git head, which is 1.3.1 based. Julius disagrees with me as to the need to mark routing packets with ECN, on a system that is doing probalistic dropping. He may be right. In my own case, the 'vision' is to ultimately find some sort of congestion indication on given routes via the qdisc(s). Commit: 92a1e08211256235692c8f5486023d466647b753 https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages/commit/92a1e08211256235692c8f5486023d466647b753 Author: Dave Taht Date: 2012-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 2012) Changed paths: A net/babelz/patches/0001-Mark-packets-as-ECN-capable.patch Log Message: ----------- Missed the ECN patch entirely. At some point I would like to be checking for ECN+ECT getting turned on in multiple userspace based programs, mostly for logging purposes. Also trying to detect what sorts of streams get probalistically marked. This isn't that, merely turning on the ECT bit. Compare: https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages/compare/36281bf...92a1e08