From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
Received: from smtp1.rs.github.com (smtp1-ext.rs.github.com [207.97.227.250])
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4DF2004D7
	for <cerowrt-commits@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github.com (sh2.rs.github.com [50.57.128.197])
	by smtp1.rs.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E229D42CA3
	for <cerowrt-commits@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:56:27 -0700
From: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
To: cerowrt-commits@lists.bufferbloat.net
Message-ID: <4f8a0eabcde49_67ccf9caf4977dc@sh2.rs.github.com.mail>
Subject: [dtaht/deBloat] fa9d01: Still working through these.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="--==_mimepart_4f8a0eabcba22_67ccf9caf4975df";
	charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-commits@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Reply-To: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
List-Id: Development commits for the cerowrt project
	<cerowrt-commits.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-commits>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-commits-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-commits>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-commits@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-commits-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-commits>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-commits-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:56:31 -0000



----==_mimepart_4f8a0eabcba22_67ccf9caf4975df
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:56:27 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-ID: <4f8a0eabccee2_67ccf9caf497685@sh2.rs.github.com.mail>

  Branch: refs/heads/master
  Home:   https://github.com/dtaht/deBloat
  Commit: fa9d011b6bc9531b9b235a438701aa4affe46252
      https://github.com/dtaht/deBloat/commit/fa9d011b6bc9531b9b235a438701aa4affe46252
  Author: Dave Taht <dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
  Date:   2012-04-14 (Sat, 14 Apr 2012)

  Changed paths:
    A src/sfqnew.test
    A src/sfqnew_both.test
    A src/sfqold.test
    M src/simple_qos.sh

  Log Message:
  -----------
  Still working through these.

With the mark 1 eyeball, sfq with enqueue to head wins. It recovers
faster than the alternative when burdened by multiple streams.


  Commit: faac0d286fab0f0416272bc8171310c45bfd7bad
      https://github.com/dtaht/deBloat/commit/faac0d286fab0f0416272bc8171310c45bfd7bad
  Author: Dave Taht <dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
  Date:   2012-04-14 (Sat, 14 Apr 2012)

  Changed paths:
    A src/sfqnewboth.log

  Log Message:
  -----------
  I show perfect fairness with 50 streams and 150 buffers...

this is with sfqred on both sides, htb on the far side doing
4Mbit limit (and we hit that, exactly), and no starvation.


Compare: https://github.com/dtaht/deBloat/compare/a79ec97...faac0d2

----==_mimepart_4f8a0eabcba22_67ccf9caf4975df--