From: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
To: cerowrt-commits@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [dtaht/ceropackages-3.3] 4701ef: debloat: smaller quantums seem to be better
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:50:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ffb7c6e882a4_35e1d66af0857a4@sh2.rs.github.com.mail> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 553 bytes --]
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.3
Commit: 4701ef56645a5566b0c07e08ceb8ad541c3de7b9
https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.3/commit/4701ef56645a5566b0c07e08ceb8ad541c3de7b9
Author: Dave Taht <dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
Date: 2012-07-09 (Mon, 09 Jul 2012)
Changed paths:
M net/debloat/files/debloat
Log Message:
-----------
debloat: smaller quantums seem to be better
despite intuition saying we wanted packet aggregation to work better,
smaller quantums seem to work better.
reply other threads:[~2012-07-10 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ffb7c6e882a4_35e1d66af0857a4@sh2.rs.github.com.mail \
--to=noreply@github.com \
--cc=cerowrt-commits@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox