From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D16421F20D for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49312054D; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:32:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:32:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imap.cc; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=mesmtp; bh=vtp11lYEmsQnwzcx1YYM46Cu6Kc=; b=SqLheIeSzvmD35PS7sdmgLp6Fs7d kAx0KkCVAbyFfs/J4l4zJRy3gPPbefVKODBZRDPiF3gCu9CYVuZhjePO3eAcgcXU uACOmWKWECw5nLU58Y1MToJjpvJfUqxNNfeyhOP5yxCv1rsjDs9U6XImls4V1voU 2sPpSyi4AUTbWFM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to; s=smtpout; bh=vtp11lYEmsQnwzcx1YYM46Cu6Kc=; b=IR Sz5ACOxQ0RjFS3PG9Y5n1XTYlXuH/6Gh4653bmwERz0Rd9D5lyr/SF83lfT2+Wp1 Oy7JabGD1gI17tn9yJX9WibxT5QN2cL9pe6fMa2cpo1HLooAD3KTRjHQE+D2/l6M 4KgOeNp6voohgCUuwaLh2kUaMNf94EIb+Gnw/nR4E= X-Sasl-enc: aH8x7eeteKm5tOa50zL656ucfATWHS8sqYaxEgBTJJA0 1381426377 Received: from [172.30.42.15] (unknown [2.96.60.31]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 64751C00E81 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:32:57 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Fred Stratton In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:32:55 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <018A686A-6E66-428D-942D-5B31DE93A061@imap.cc> References: <9A9AF30E-7F5A-41DF-AE94-0C92AD7BBED9@imap.cc> To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Names not resolved on Wireless X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:32:59 -0000 With the last three builds, there is no ipv4 connection to OS X 10.7.5 = or Ubuntu 12.04.3 clients. ipv6 works, but that is not the = responsibility of DNSMasq yet, IIRC. Attempts at ipv4 lease renewal = fail on both clients. Have reverted from 3.10.15-2 to 3.10.11-3 again, awaiting another build = of DNSMasq. On 10 Oct 2013, at 15:43, Dave Taht wrote: > Dear Dr. Dnsmasq: >=20 > When cerowrt made the jump between dnsmasq-2.67-test10 and > dnsmasq-2.67-test17, detection of interfaces other than the first > started failing. It seems to be related to interfaces that come up > after dnsmasq starts, as restarting it after the device is fully > booted works. Have moved forward to 2.67-rc3 to no avail. >=20 > (along the way we migrated from kernel 3.10.11 to 3.10.13 to 3.10.15 > but I doubt that's the issue) >=20 > Hot, fresh, firmware can be had at: >=20 > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/ >=20 >=20 > [10:39:25] has anyone had IPv4 DHCP problems in the last two = 3.10.x > builds? currently running 3.10.11-3 and it works flawlessly. > upgraded to 3.10.13-2 and 3.10.15-1 and both present me with an > identical issue. upon reboot after upgrading, DHCP leases are no > longer handed out on the wireless interfaces. disabling and > re-enabling DHCP on the wireless interfaces will fix the problem, but > the problem > [10:39:26] returns after a reboot. disable/reenable DHCP on = the > interface will again temporarily fix it. > [10:42:03] also tried a fresh install (using reset to = defaults > option) to avoid anything not properly interpreted from the config of > the previous version, but still get the same issue. >=20 >=20 > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:30 AM, David Personette = wrote: >> Just tested again with 3.10.15-2. My OSX (10.8.5) laptop worked, = neither my >> Nexus 7 (2013 w/CM10.2) or my Fedora 19 laptop could resolve DNS over >> wireless. My wired Linux server (Ubuntu 12.04.3) was working fine as = well. >> Reverted to 3.10.11-3 once more. >>=20 >> -- >> David P. >>=20 >>=20 >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:40 PM, David Personette = wrote: >>>=20 >>> I can confirm it as well. I wiped my config back to defaults, and it >>> wasn't fixed. Reinstalled the 3.10.11-3 build, and restored my = configs and >>> all is well. >>>=20 >>> -- >>> David P. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Fred Stratton >>> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> True for the last two builds. Wired works as expected. >>>>=20 >>>> Is this a problem with the development version of DNSMasq? What is = the >>>> recommended workaround? >>>>=20 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >>>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Dave T=E4ht >=20 > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: = http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html