From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B470921F14C for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:19:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C97E20A92; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 16:19:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:19:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imap.cc; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=mesmtp; bh=i04S7D5cYiV3UgE89o07jfd8SXw=; b=xxq2SrvdW8IINIuZ8JIkxLyOyaVb jQcNq3rWCked3BGnGg0jtn2Tn51duku6KK6yRL+E8s09m7TNxHTgr9/v6+uyft83 bnNXcIJuJyXQQymHpWGp6jkkTaxFx3Szd85sKnPsGsv+xeiYhq7Fi1le8zH4h7w7 Fd+OsfkZ5J6B0x0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to; s=smtpout; bh=i04S7D5cYiV3UgE89o07jfd8SXw=; b=Tm 8FeBtaAdCkljnq6BsuzuZPHAKCpDhzOWBQYFBt/IKImEAETILJhQ3tLtcX14+Urk 4UIyD8Q2iwlm2hrWpgf+YxTNvOlnzu13dhMBCZe5UP0MjNyHqFPdxnpzW1U3YPXp K67W70jWMoup+zgIr1L2d+mlOPWZX4HK6Kt6FxMmw= X-Sasl-enc: u8siCdF4wRhRLrRCkeG5lFNTwoPO5pObCiatuNgKAFkV 1370636341 Received: from [172.30.42.15] (unknown [188.221.232.223]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 76800680200 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 16:19:01 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) From: Fred Stratton In-Reply-To: <51B21361.8070109@openwrt.org> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 21:19:00 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <02A5C1F8-ECE7-4D86-9ECC-F882701C1449@imap.cc> References: <2FB25374-452D-414E-9056-016C0C2C4FF8@imap.cc> <51B21361.8070109@openwrt.org> To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.8.13-6 No name resolution over wireless X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 20:19:05 -0000 Thank you for the explanation, FF.=20 A PC connected by ethernet appeared to not renew its lease this = morning., which chimes with what you say. At that point, I went back to = the previous Cerowrt build, in which I have replaced /usr/lib/aqm with = the latest scripts. DT: You have a User. It is I. If something does not work, I report it.=20 I have been doing this since I was put in a room with a PDP-8 as a = student. Your AQM efforts are better demonstrated if they are on a functioning = device. A major issue is whether constantly upgrading components alongside your = efforts helps or hinders those efforts. That is your decision to make. Concerning your rrul test request, it will be interesting to see if = others can successfully connect devices to the latest build. (Edited to be grumpy) On 7 Jun 2013, at 18:07, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2013-06-06 12:23 PM, Fred Stratton wrote: >> Taeht wants all User posting on this list. >>=20 >> I am not a developer, though you need a certain skill set to = manipulate Cerowrt as a user. >>=20 >> The weather here is good, whilst the rest of Europe drowns, and = poorer wireless reception has come with the sunshine, which hampers = troubleshooting. >>=20 >> This build works better on ADSL, so I am reluctant to regress to an = earlier one. >>=20 >> Ethernet connected clients work as expected. >>=20 >> Wireless clients connect, but neither Ubuntu 12.04.2 nor ML machines = can resolve URIs. >>=20 >> I suspect this is a configuration problem. /etc/config/wireless is = difficult to understand with so many routed interfaces. >>=20 >> 3.8.13-5 did not have the problem. > Sounds like a regression that was in OpenWrt HEAD for a short time > (fixed now). Once Dave pulls in the new version, it should work again. >=20 > - Felix >=20