Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't)

[Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 14 bytes --]

Hi Mikael,




[-- Attachment #2: sqm-scripts.zip --]
[-- Type: application/zip, Size: 28330 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 1214 bytes --]


On Jun 28, 2015, at 21:17 , Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:

> On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> 
>> So either I mixed things up later or Mikael’s simple.qos somehow got stale. Anyway, there is work thee for me to do to fix this up properly.
> 
> I believe this is simple.qos from whatever nightly OpenWRT build there is. It's quite likely it didn't pull any of the sqm-scripts from the CeroWrt feed at all.


attached is the most recent version of sqm-scripts, just drop simple.qos, simples.qos and functions.sh from that into your router’s /usr/lib/sqm and you should be running to most recent version then. I would love to see the output of:
1) tc - d qdisc 					# before and after selecting cake in the GUI and choosing cake as the link layer adjustment mechanism filed (gated by the advanced options checkbox)
2) tc -d class show dev eth0
3) tc -d class show dev ifb4eth0


Maybe I screwed up the release numbers, maybe the older states have higher numbers and hence the changes do not appear in the openwrt repository (but not enough information, so conjecture on my part)

Best Regards
	Sebastian
> 
> -- 
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se