Please feel free to give this a shot as a devbuild instead of 3.10.10I did manage to test 3.10.10-1 briefly. It worked. I note that configuring ipv6 properly is still up in the air vs 6relayd or dnsmasq.Based on that working, I did the very minor upgrade to build 3.10.11-2 (I goofed the first time, thus no -1)
http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.11-2/
_______________________________________________On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
+ dnsmasq 2.67test10+ readlink fix (hopefully fixes sysupgrade)+ usual merge with openwrt head (tons of ath9k changes)
+ ipv6subtrees back in+ the final htb atm patches+ eliminated maxpacket check in codel- did not fold in edumazet's new fq code- 100% totally untested. May a braver soul than I give it a shot. I won't be near a cero box til thursday, otherwise.
http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.10-1/-I'm not sure if I got the "last" of the aqm gui patches in there or not...
...Anyway... I had hopes to get a stable release out in august. I AM very happy about the major stuff that got fixed, instead... but...
Since we didn't... I now have a ton of other matters piled up. Not least of which is a pending trip to england and the eu.
So for the next month I don't see how I'm going to be able to put more than a day a week into cerowrt. Tops. So I have tagged up this "release" and pushed all the baked portions of the sources to github. I'm still a little dubious of the ipv6 subtrees bit....
--
Dave Täht
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel