From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from omr2.cc.vt.edu (omr2.cc.ipv6.vt.edu [IPv6:2001:468:c80:2105:0:24d:7091:8b9c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A10D21F212 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 20:25:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mr6.cc.vt.edu (mr6.cc.vt.edu [198.82.141.20] (may be forged)) by omr2.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0Q4Pab5013146; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:25:36 -0500 Received: from auth1.smtp.vt.edu (auth1.smtp.vt.edu [198.82.161.152] (may be forged)) by mr6.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0Q4PVAU009016; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:25:36 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([IPv6:2601:b:3180:4d3:9147:6f8b:fb95:b07b]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth1.smtp.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0Q4PUtl029652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:25:30 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6+dev To: David Lang In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:57:01 -0800." From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <54B5D28A.3010906@gmail.com> <7B1EA8F0-FCB6-4A37-950F-2558FC751DE8@gmail.com> <54C038D0.1000305@gmail.com> <54C0BD22.3000608@gmail.com> <54C13F47.1010203@gmail.com> <1422111577.328132080@apps.rackspace.com> <1422217048.025611275@apps.rackspace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1422246330_2175P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:25:30 -0500 Message-ID: <11071.1422246330@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mr6.cc.vt.edu Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Recording RF management info _and_ associated traffic? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 04:26:09 -0000 --==_Exmh_1422246330_2175P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:57:01 -0800, David Lang said: > The Computer Scientist will cringe at the 'hacks' that this introduces, but > there is far more progress made when new capabilities can be added in a way > that's transparent to other layers of the stack then when it requires major > changes to how things work. Otherwise known as the "Just throw an F5 in front of the whole mess" school of network design... :) --==_Exmh_1422246330_2175P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQIVAwUBVMXBuQdmEQWDXROgAQKSrQ/+ONl/gHjcKXooCj+74UnAfYE2iI3vJ3yM m2sxAJjtONYq00nGPzmqj+f58xAfNsgl2T3DcMxxiSmm/h5lFglh/ZU6VyzkVZpc KUQK0zYciC/RtHcHV/9+AcJifspZuTEHwwgpmFMP3/bwZ5Z3ITNu0lpXb/MwT9hj JT2Gt2EzuKJzd60z6oTVGKvsoQH0QAmUvITKNaUZ08QFqKr2Pt30rC3x+RzCwDnD pGByESGBY4CkoqfXDCyDgYeNf5xk6cAGdS0BaeEjWOYisKgXpUhhYDWJSlFTdXS8 hraHyv81e1KyGtghEaP0io3M6J1PhW52TPsr06OZ6I8xW4m5AQwUtSiJcsN5YMEN ZkdNlFMDdPdFayHg1FH44itcsc16h1Ko1Lbx7TdkGeFE9giegtQ+VkRLEF6Gjk2d +OBCB7fbsQZen8gPLN6h+vvZQz9GouAo7M+Sl+u77/gLnBvhN1yzspwTzkojijju Em2AxmkxmqLKVTg6ucDIY96LXgHv1AYYLhwHrv3wE+Zone3fPdQIusd31beI5XKg c7pOTGd/aGIHkp7jHGHtK0gEEVUVn2+19YhwhuuB141AuIvEYKV8uA1a0wzjJIii Snl9P5xZdPsvoKmLWV8AC9jhxpjrVWkEhl9KpS6R3G6qt3fOxJCzeozLZA0OyoAE cxSMaGlCsdQ= =nQmG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1422246330_2175P--