From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat-devel <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Network tests as discussed in Washington, DC
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:58:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12051.1352678335@obiwan.sandelman.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4fKBEoCy1d_+nPekODDbYP5dow1J9WNHxiy0oJvARsOQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1883 bytes --]
Re: FCC.
The IETF IAB plenary last Wednesday had a presenter from the FCC,
who claimed to care about latency in response to my question.
I don't claim it's a good use of your time to listen to these, but
probably having the links in the archive is useful.
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/slides/slides-85-iesg-opsandtech-6
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/slides/slides-85-iesg-opsandtech-7
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/slides/slides-85-iesg-opsandtech-8
http://ietf85.conf.meetecho.com/index.php/Recorded_Sessions
http://recordings.conf.meetecho.com/Recordings/watch.jsp?recording=IETF85_PLENARY&chapter=part_11
5. Technical Topic: Measurement Issues in the Internet
Moderator: Alissa Cooper
Speakers: Sam Crawford and Henning Schulzrinne
Although network performance measurement has been a topic of research,
standardization, and development for decades, recent efforts to create
national, regional, and global access network measurement testbeds and
frameworks are drawing renewed interest. These efforts seek to provide
consistent measurements of fine-grained performance metrics such as
packet loss, delay, and throughput, as well as higher order tests to
capture quality of experience with respect to specific applications and
services. Some standardized metrics and tests exist, including those
developed in the IPPM WG, but a unified framework for observing and
reporting the quality metrics that define users experiences across
different networks has yet to be developed. This plenary will examine
the implications of large-scale network performance measurement for the
Internet by exploring the approaches, results, and challenges involved
with measurement efforts from around the world.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 307 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-11 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-10 10:54 Dave Taht
2012-11-10 14:18 ` dpreed
2012-11-11 8:40 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Daniel Berger
2012-11-11 13:39 ` Dave Taht
2012-11-11 23:58 ` Michael Richardson [this message]
2012-11-13 2:11 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " dpreed
2012-12-08 6:53 ` [Cerowrt-devel] Dave's "Water Videos" posted to YouTube Richard Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12051.1352678335@obiwan.sandelman.ca \
--to=mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca \
--cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox