From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2032021F1EF for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 01:29:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from u-089-cab204a2.am1.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.89.3]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDR21-1WTilk2iZZ-00GpCM for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:29:41 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:29:36 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <128185AE-918F-4944-BB45-B5D20A1AD1E5@gmx.de> References: <20140223172140.GB24483@lists.bufferbloat.net> <530A4791.8080903@ashtonfam.org> To: Vincent Frentzel X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:az+9S8RBeR+3rbmjtpEBzGi5IhRZRXje8AKzYillMpitoMvC+ev jsu/pf+MXJRAVSLKrU46fB+6g7O92q0Hbtytw4khAkoE7PZDZHffDsJ8rn+T18t3pZPCUa8 r9N6GBG1yJA311JivFX6ZuJM9XAaSAy1xLgbrPxIZMGWOrYnHIZlrqfanhvKxq59HC/TNpg 9/Wj8ZNiwQI1Ktsi+s7UA== Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] saner defaults for config/firewall X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:29:45 -0000 Hi Vincent, On Feb 24, 2014, at 09:07 , Vincent Frentzel wrote: >=20 >> 1) a more "normal", bridged implementation more like people are used = to. >=20 >=20 > Regarding this scenario. I tried to revert cerowrt to a bridged setup = and ended up with a completely broken system.=20 >=20 > I bridged the interface as follow, eth0.1 + sw10 + sw00. Connecting = over wifi worked fine except that cabled host could not be pinged. = Connecting over ethernet did nt work at all (no DHCP received, cannot = ping router with manually assigned IP). I could be totally out for lunch here, but shouldn't that be = se00 (secure ethernet) instead of eth0.1? At least on 3.10.28-14 neuter = "ifconfig" nor /etc/config/network mentions eth0.1 at all. Could you = post both of these (so the result of calling ifconfig on a terminal on = the router and the content of /etc/config/network ;), I am sure you know = what I meant, just dying to be verbose for the sake of people stumbling = over the archive of the mailing list) >=20 > Was something related to bridges removed in cerowrt? >=20 > The config I used works fine on Barrier Breaker. >=20 best regards Sebastian > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel