From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from omr2.cc.vt.edu (omr2.cc.ipv6.vt.edu [IPv6:2607:b400:92:8400:0:33:fb76:806e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D33F3B47C for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:58:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mr5.cc.vt.edu (mr5.cc.ipv6.vt.edu [IPv6:2001:468:c80:2105:0:2b8:b328:9234]) by omr2.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3L1w9Wi007875; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:58:09 -0400 Received: from auth1.smtp.vt.edu (auth1.smtp.vt.edu [198.82.161.152] (may be forged)) by mr5.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3L1w8ts024362; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:58:08 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([IPv6:2601:5c0:c100:993:be85:56ff:fe1f:4f6d]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth1.smtp.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3L1w8Tb014559 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:58:08 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6+dev To: Dave Taht Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu In-Reply-To: References: <9146.1461194647@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1461203888_7324P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:58:08 -0400 Message-ID: <13261.1461203888@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mr5.cc.vt.edu Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] OK, what's the current recommendation(s)? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 01:58:10 -0000 --==_Exmh_1461203888_7324P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:48:51 -0700, Dave Taht said: > Can't recommend anything at =24100 at the moment. The linksys 1200ac > comes closest. I have one running on a 125/25 connection using cake > just fine - but I can still pretty easily crash it on the wifi as of > openwrt trunk from a month back. The wifi is great while it lasts > tho.... Thanks for the pointer, poked around on Amazon and the OpenWRT site, the = 1200AC looks like a workable choice feature-wise and for my bank account. Will probably go with that. Will probably flash the 3800 with openwrt 15.05 and benchmark it a bit be= fore I replace it... --==_Exmh_1461203888_7324P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQIVAwUBVxgzsAdmEQWDXROgAQIG+g/9GqgKwxki3WM72HKzFzZlV6wI83zBreCT JI7WzU1Uy2cNLfy18pKdqSA0Zv0um4Iu+waVAiJ14deKa2UkkGgWmGlQoOAG2uiF 1iT65As8if0+abO3k2EDuE2d+egTdS0LxggwJfFKki74I5Z7za/Xtqm39VxqxUv3 pajJBxIDeJeLHv3++5ZecQzT6GkzulNA229ODM242iFnhbDTAeCgmf1P5/yxivDl oN2rtkpVXZZGQIbESKIdZPYY1dONpC0wdOfcIsx+p9uTpPkHAOO6SiWmaDNBISIM 30PoPCTo3zbN/8NrYDvbeJW0aBxPGvx4ewcR/p++vhAsfTxDbMaM9E+y1lUh+7uE UG+VBKeOd7VL1hqRrZcXd29+hnLsM3SPjOvH5OdmB1wJ4LrjDmPInXREW9RSKu68 qmOs7EBUN5yHCbdBi8JSVy/f2+a33Hs3lc2NPJr+6TKIelpxqxdAXf2vFTj4DUZz f2ldn5020rBdMAXO870xWGsRsuaS2LHx2zpewXbymEF1kx50hf7EW8xlL/lYpwyb oeZM7CWoOBfAgobSP+h1HZ/l1ZZno4tqOaZ/NKkTVFv8ppRdskEPWQXjrrX6Oe5l vbV5BZFAVZog+eJDxBA/CS+kP4m101Z2qvEMtdXeBOH0YkkOQCHRbi0wQkMbp2hN +g73YTg1leM= =WfBX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1461203888_7324P--