Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dpreed@reed.com
To: "William Katsak" <wkatsak@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Anyone using PPPoE with Sugarland?
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:25:14 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357424714.707316439@apps.rackspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F3C8CE17-E50D-4B6D-9CB6-4F1C1D9CF0DE@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1955 bytes --]


I am using 3.7.1-1, and comparing my simple_qos.sh config with yours, I don't see any QDISC=... line in yours.
So is it possible you need that?  The egress() interface setup in simple_qos.sh uses that to set the queue discipline.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: "William Katsak" <wkatsak@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2013 4:37pm
To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Anyone using PPPoE with Sugarland?



Hello,

I am experimenting with using Cero/Sugarland on a PPPoE connection, and can't seem to find a config of simple_qos that works well.

The service is DSL, PPPoE, 3M/768K. Without any qos, the router works well, as expected. When I try to use simple_qos, the clients have trouble loading websites (hangs while loading, etc).

Netlyzer shows upstream buffering of about 650ms, consistently. I have tried various higher and lower values for UPLINK and DOWNLINK, but nothing seems to help. Anyway, I think 15-20% below link should be fine.

Here is my config:
UPLINK=550
DOWNLINK=1900
DEV=ifb0
IFACE=ge00
DEPTH=42
TC=/usr/sbin/tc
FLOWS=8000
PERTURB="perturb 0" # Permutation is costly, disable
FLOWS=16000 # 
BQL_MAX=3000 # it is important to factor this into the RED calc

CEIL=$UPLINK
MTU=1492
ADSLL=""
PPOE=yes

Couple of things I am unsure about:
1) Should the IFACE be ge00 or pppoe-ge00?
2) Should the MTU be the pppoe mtu (1492) or the ethernet (1500)

One last thing: I have the lan split up into VLAN interfaces se00.1, se00.100, and se00.200. Everything otherwise works as expected with these, but could the naming be breaking something?

If anyone is willing to share a working configuration it would be much appreciated.

Thanks,
Bill Katsak

_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2414 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-05 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-05 21:37 William Katsak
2013-01-05 22:25 ` dpreed [this message]
2013-01-06 15:31   ` William Katsak
2013-01-06  5:31 ` Dave Taht
2013-01-06 15:31   ` William Katsak
2013-01-06 21:47   ` Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1357424714.707316439@apps.rackspace.com \
    --to=dpreed@reed.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=wkatsak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox