From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp111.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp111.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E98421F0BD for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:25:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp31.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id DA2C53E05C1; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:25:14 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: from legacy18.wa-web.iad1a (legacy18.wa-web.iad1a.rsapps.net [192.168.4.108]) by smtp31.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C07D73E0331; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:25:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from reed.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by legacy18.wa-web.iad1a (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1F836002E; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:25:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: dpreed@reed.com, from: dpreed@reed.com) with HTTP; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:25:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:25:14 -0500 (EST) From: dpreed@reed.com To: "William Katsak" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_20130105172514000000_28827" Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Type: html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1357424714.707316439@apps.rackspace.com> X-Mailer: webmail7.0 Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] =?utf-8?q?Anyone_using_PPPoE_with_Sugarland=3F?= X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:25:16 -0000 ------=_20130105172514000000_28827 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0AI am using 3.7.1-1, and comparing my simple_qos.sh config with yours, I = don't see any QDISC=3D... line in yours.=0ASo is it possible you need that?= The egress() interface setup in simple_qos.sh uses that to set the queue = discipline.=0A =0A-----Original Message-----=0AFrom: "William Katsak" =0ASent: Saturday, January 5, 2013 4:37pm=0ATo: "cerowrt-deve= l@lists.bufferbloat.net" =0ASubject: [= Cerowrt-devel] Anyone using PPPoE with Sugarland?=0A=0A=0A=0AHello,=0A=0AI = am experimenting with using Cero/Sugarland on a PPPoE connection, and can't= seem to find a config of simple_qos that works well.=0A=0AThe service is D= SL, PPPoE, 3M/768K. Without any qos, the router works well, as expected. Wh= en I try to use simple_qos, the clients have trouble loading websites (hang= s while loading, etc).=0A=0ANetlyzer shows upstream buffering of about 650m= s, consistently. I have tried various higher and lower values for UPLINK an= d DOWNLINK, but nothing seems to help. Anyway, I think 15-20% below link sh= ould be fine.=0A=0AHere is my config:=0AUPLINK=3D550=0ADOWNLINK=3D1900=0ADE= V=3Difb0=0AIFACE=3Dge00=0ADEPTH=3D42=0ATC=3D/usr/sbin/tc=0AFLOWS=3D8000=0AP= ERTURB=3D"perturb 0" # Permutation is costly, disable=0AFLOWS=3D16000 # =0A= BQL_MAX=3D3000 # it is important to factor this into the RED calc=0A=0ACEIL= =3D$UPLINK=0AMTU=3D1492=0AADSLL=3D""=0APPOE=3Dyes=0A=0ACouple of things I a= m unsure about:=0A1) Should the IFACE be ge00 or pppoe-ge00?=0A2) Should th= e MTU be the pppoe mtu (1492) or the ethernet (1500)=0A=0AOne last thing: I= have the lan split up into VLAN interfaces se00.1, se00.100, and se00.200.= Everything otherwise works as expected with these, but could the naming be= breaking something?=0A=0AIf anyone is willing to share a working configura= tion it would be much appreciated.=0A=0AThanks,=0ABill Katsak=0A=0A________= _______________________________________=0ACerowrt-devel mailing list=0ACero= wrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net=0Ahttps://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ce= rowrt-devel ------=_20130105172514000000_28827 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= I am using 3.7.1-1, and comparing my simple_qos.sh config with yours, I don= 't see any QDISC=3D... line in yours.

=0A

So is it possible you need that?  The egress() interface setup in si= mple_qos.sh uses that to set the queue discipline.

=0A

 

=0A

-----Original = Message-----
From: "William Katsak" <wkatsak@gmail.com>
Sen= t: Saturday, January 5, 2013 4:37pm
To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferblo= at.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Cerowrt-= devel] Anyone using PPPoE with Sugarland?

=0A
=0A

Hello,

I a= m experimenting with using Cero/Sugarland on a PPPoE connection, and can't = seem to find a config of simple_qos that works well.

The service= is DSL, PPPoE, 3M/768K. Without any qos, the router works well, as expecte= d. When I try to use simple_qos, the clients have trouble loading websites = (hangs while loading, etc).

Netlyzer shows upstream buffering of= about 650ms, consistently. I have tried various higher and lower values fo= r UPLINK and DOWNLINK, but nothing seems to help. Anyway, I think 15-20% be= low link should be fine.

Here is my config:
UPLINK=3D550DOWNLINK=3D1900
DEV=3Difb0
IFACE=3Dge00
DEPTH=3D42
T= C=3D/usr/sbin/tc
FLOWS=3D8000
PERTURB=3D"perturb 0" # Permutation= is costly, disable
FLOWS=3D16000 #
BQL_MAX=3D3000 # it is impor= tant to factor this into the RED calc

CEIL=3D$UPLINK
MTU=3D= 1492
ADSLL=3D""
PPOE=3Dyes

Couple of things I am unsur= e about:
1) Should the IFACE be ge00 or pppoe-ge00?
2) Should the= MTU be the pppoe mtu (1492) or the ethernet (1500)

One last thi= ng: I have the lan split up into VLAN interfaces se00.1, se00.100, and se00= .200. Everything otherwise works as expected with these, but could the nami= ng be breaking something?

If anyone is willing to share a workin= g configuration it would be much appreciated.

Thanks,
Bill = Katsak

_______________________________________________
Cero= wrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https:= //lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

=0A
 ------=_20130105172514000000_28827--