From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp201.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp201.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E5021F196 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:14:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp30.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A8C77204F9; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:14:22 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: from legacy18.wa-web.iad1a (legacy18.wa-web.iad1a.rsapps.net [192.168.4.108]) by smtp30.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8ED1C20582; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:14:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from reed.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by legacy18.wa-web.iad1a (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF5636002E; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:14:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: dpreed@reed.com, from: dpreed@reed.com) with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:14:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:14:22 -0500 (EST) From: dpreed@reed.com To: "Maciej Soltysiak" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_20130124161422000000_26514" Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Type: html Message-ID: <1359062062.51855992@apps.rackspace.com> X-Mailer: webmail7.0 Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 250 Mb/s X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:14:24 -0000 ------=_20130124161422000000_26514 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A=0AActually, I was just thinking about a similar issue when I saw this b= aby in Staples when browsing:=0A =0Ahttp://www.motorola.com/us/consumers/SB= G6580-SURFboard%C2%AE-eXtreme-Wireless-Cable-Modem/70902,en_US,pd.html=0A = =0AWould OpenWRT run on it? CeroWRT? Since it contains the DOCSIS 3.0 st= uff, could it negotiate the settings that eliminate bufferbloat in the CMTS= ?=0A =0AIf one wanted to expand CeroWRT to benefit lots of homes even more,= this would be wicked awesome as a target.=0A =0AMoto also sells a DSL rout= er/AP (not quite as high performance) that might be interesting as well:=0A= =0Ahttp://www.motorola.com/us/consumers/SBG6580-SURFboard%C2%AE-eXtreme-Wi= reless-Cable-Modem/70902,en_US,pd.html=0A =0AI think most US Cable Internet= providers allow you to use your own cable modem if it is DOCSIS 3.0.=0A = =0A-----Original Message-----=0AFrom: "Maciej Soltysiak" =0ASent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 3:38pm=0ATo: cerowrt-devel@lists.bu= fferbloat.net=0ASubject: [Cerowrt-devel] 250 Mb/s=0A=0A=0A=0AFYI, got a lea= flet today from my ISP with an offer of "up to 250Mb/s" FTTH.=0AI wonder wh= at software stack is used in FTTH modems and how hackable are they=0Aand wo= uld openwrt ever run on such NTUs.=0AMaciej ------=_20130124161422000000_26514 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= =0A

Actually, I was just thinkin= g about a similar issue when I saw this baby in Staples when browsing:

= =0A

 

=0A

http://www.motorola.com/= us/consumers/SBG6580-SURFboard%C2%AE-eXtreme-Wireless-Cable-Modem/70902,en_= US,pd.html

=0A

&nb= sp;

=0A

Would Open= WRT run on it?  CeroWRT?   Since it contains the DOCSIS 3.0 = stuff, could it negotiate the settings that eliminate bufferbloat in the CM= TS?

=0A

 

= =0A

If one wanted to = expand CeroWRT to benefit lots of homes even more, this would be wicked awe= some as a target.

=0A

 

=0A

Mot= o also sells a DSL router/AP (not quite as high performance) that might be = interesting as well:

=0A

 

=0A

= http://www.motorola.com/us/consumers/SBG6580-SURFboard%C2%AE-eXtreme-Wirele= ss-Cable-Modem/70902,en_US,pd.html

=0A

 

=0A

I think most US Cable Internet providers allow you to use you= r own cable modem if it is DOCSIS 3.0.

=0A

 

=0A

-----Original Message-----
From: "Maciej Soltysiak" = <maciej@soltysiak.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 3:38pmTo: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] 2= 50 Mb/s

=0A
=0A
FYI, got= a leaflet today from my ISP with an offer of "up to 250Mb/s" FTTH.
= =0A
I wonder what software stack is used in FTTH modems and how hackabl= e are they
=0A
and would openwrt ever run on such NTUs.
=0AMaciej
=0A=0A

 ------=_20130124161422000000_26514--