From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp181.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp181.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64A1D21F1D2 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:11:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp58.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1F9D83081DF; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:11:35 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: from legacy9.wa-web.iad1a (legacy9.wa-web.iad1a.rsapps.net [192.168.4.111]) by smtp58.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0372230819C; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:11:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from reed.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by legacy9.wa-web.iad1a (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C741F8119; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:11:34 -0500 (EST) Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: dpreed@reed.com, from: dpreed@reed.com) with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:11:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:11:34 -0500 (EST) From: dpreed@reed.com To: "Dave Taht" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_20130203201134000000_83421" Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Type: html In-Reply-To: References: <2450269.5e6MBhORZ9@markc> <1359915996.128612322@apps.rackspace.com> Message-ID: <1359940294.947925589@apps.rackspace.com> X-Mailer: webmail7.0 Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] stanford talk/deluged in hardware/yurtlab X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 01:11:36 -0000 ------=_20130203201134000000_83421 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0Ahttp://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/2/prweb9154394.htm (10 GigE FMC card)= =0A =0Ahttp://www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/1-2AJPAV.htm (1 GiGE = FMC card)=0A =0A-----Original Message-----=0AFrom: "Dave Taht" =0ASent: Sunday, February 3, 2013 1:39pm=0ATo: dpreed@reed.com=0AC= c: "Mark Constable" , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net= =0ASubject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] stanford talk/deluged in hardware/yurtlab= =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AOn Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:26 AM, <[mailto:dpreed@reed.co= m] dpreed@reed.com> wrote:=0A=0AIt would be trivial to do this with a Zedbo= ard.=0A=0AWell, need two network ports. Haven't figured out much on interfa= cing the thing to offboard gear (I'd have liked it if it had a pci interfac= e). So is interfacing up a second network card "trivial" on the I/Os provid= ed?=0A=0AAnd wanted esata, or some high speed disk I/O interface for captur= es.=0A=0AI'd rather like to continue forward on the zedboard front. The pro= spect of designing an ethernet chip that actually could incorporate fq_code= l etc is very exciting. The RGII interface is available to access directly,= in particular.=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0A=0A =0A-----Original Message-----=0AFr= om: "Dave Taht" <[mailto:dave.taht@gmail.com] dave.taht@gmail.com>=0ASent: = Sunday, February 3, 2013 1:17pm=0ATo: "Mark Constable" <[mailto:markc@renta= .net] markc@renta.net>=0A Cc: [mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net] = cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net=0ASubject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] stanford= talk/deluged in hardware/yurtlab=0A=0A=0A=0AWell, I see it for 320. Then y= ou need to add a SSD, and a decent network card, and I suppose it could be = made to work. Awful big, tho, in an era where I can get 1/2TB on an 2.5 inc= h SSD.=0A=0AWhat I'd wanted was closer to a dreamplug - 160 bucks, two netw= ork ports, but with an internal SSD. bonus points if it fit into a 1U rack = and ate as little power as possible.=0A=0APrincipal use case here is to be = a "network monitor" with enough oomph to run stuff like cacti/mrtg/snmp too= ls, as well as do captures off of a mirrored switch port.=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AOn = Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Dave Taht <[mailto:dave.taht@gmail.com] dave.= taht@gmail.com> wrote:=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AOn Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mark = Constable <[mailto:markc@renta.net] markc@renta.net> wrote:=0A=0AOn 2013-02= -03 09:18am, Dave Taht wrote:=0A > I'm grumpy, as it doesn't have an esata = interface internally, apparently.=0A=0A[https://www.google.com?q=3DHP+N40L+= MicroServer] https://www.google.com?q=3DHP+N40L+MicroServer=0A=0A I know th= is is no where near an embedded device but I just got one of these=0A on sa= le (new model out) for $220 and I think it's the most useful all-round=0A c= heap server box I've ever seen. Some people have it running 16 GB ram and= =0A I've got mine booting off an SSD via external eSATA. Very well built wi= th 2=0A x half height PCI slots (4 x eth port card?). Only missing USB3 por= ts and=0A hot-swap drive space. And, very quiet with just an SSD.=0A=0A=0AI= 'd be very interested to know how fast it could do packet header captures.= =0A=0ALine rate (gigE) would be good. =0A=0ADoes it do BQL? (what is the on= board ethernet chips)=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A ________________________________= _______________=0A Cerowrt-devel mailing list=0A[mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists= .bufferbloat.net] Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net=0A[https://lists.buff= erbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/= cerowrt-devel=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A-- =0ADave T=C3=A4ht=0A=0AFixing bufferbloat= with cerowrt: [http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html] http://www.= teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html=0A=0A=0A-- =0ADave T=C3=A4ht=0A=0AFixin= g bufferbloat with cerowrt: [http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html= ] http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html=0A=0A=0A-- =0ADave T=C3=A4= ht=0A=0AFixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: [http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/s= ubscribe.html] http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html ------=_20130203201134000000_83421 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/2/prweb9154394.htm (10 GigE FMC card)=0A

 

=0A

http://www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/1-2AJPAV.htm (1 GiGE= FMC card)

=0A

 

=0A

-----Original Message-----
From: "Dave Taht" <= dave.taht@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2013 1:39pm
To:= dpreed@reed.com
Cc: "Mark Constable" <markc@renta.net>, cerowrt= -devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] stanford tal= k/deluged in hardware/yurtlab

=0A


=0A
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:2= 6 AM, <dpreed@reed.com> wrote:
=0A
=0A

It would be trivial to do this = with a Zedboard.

=0A
=0A

Well, need two net= work ports. Haven't figured out much on interfacing the thing to offboard g= ear (I'd have liked it if it had a pci interface). So is interfacing up a s= econd network card "trivial" on the I/Os provided?

And wanted es= ata, or some high speed disk I/O interface for captures.

I'd rat= her like to continue forward on the zedboard front. The prospect of designi= ng an ethernet chip that actually could incorporate fq_codel etc is very ex= citing. The RGII interface is available to access directly, in particular.<= br />



=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A

 

=0A

-----Original Message--= ---
From: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 3, 201= 3 1:17pm
To: "Mark Constable" <markc@renta.net>
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.buffer= bloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] stanford talk/deluged in ha= rdware/yurtlab

=0A
=0A

Well, I see it for 320. Then you need to add a SSD, an= d a decent network card, and I suppose it could be made to work. Awful big,= tho, in an era where I can get 1/2TB on an 2.5 inch SSD.

What I= 'd wanted was closer to a dreamplug - 160 bucks, two network ports, but wit= h an internal SSD. bonus points if it fit into a 1U rack and ate as little = power as possible.

Principal use case here is to be a "network m= onitor" with enough oomph to run stuff like cacti/mrtg/snmp tools, as well = as do captures off of a mirrored switch port.



= =0A
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
=0A


=0A
=0A
On Sun, Feb= 3, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mark Constable <markc@renta.net> wrote:<= br />=0A
=0A
On 2013-02-03 09:18am,= Dave Taht wrote:
> I'm grumpy, as it doesn't have an esata interf= ace internally, apparently.

=0Ahttps://www.google.com?q= =3DHP+N40L+MicroServer

I know this is no where near an embe= dded device but I just got one of these
on sale (new model out) for $= 220 and I think it's the most useful all-round
cheap server box I've = ever seen. Some people have it running 16 GB ram and
I've got mine bo= oting off an SSD via external eSATA. Very well built with 2
x half he= ight PCI slots (4 x eth port card?). Only missing USB3 ports and
hot-= swap drive space. And, very quiet with just an SSD.
=0A=0A

I'd be very interested to know how fast it could do packe= t header captures.

Line rate (gigE) would be good.

D= oes it do BQL? (what is the onboard ethernet chips)



=
=0A
=0A

________= _______________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing listCerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferb= loat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
=0A
=0A
=0A=

=0A
=0A

--
Dave T=C3=A4ht

Fixing= bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html=
=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A


--
D= ave T=C3=A4ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.tekl= ibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
=0A
=0A
=0A=0A
=0A


--
Dave T=C3=A4ht

Fix= ing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.h= tml
 ------=_20130203201134000000_83421--