A small suggestion. Instead of working on *algorithms*, focus on getting something actually *deployed* to fix the very real issues that we have today (preserving the option to upgrade later if need be).
The folks who built the Internet (I was there, as you probably know) focused on making stuff that worked and interoperated, not publishing papers or RFCs.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Wesley Eddy" <wes@mti-systems.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 1:11pm
To: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat-announce@lists.bufferbloat.net, "Martin Stiemerling" <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, "bloat" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] some good bloat related stuff on the ICCRG agenda, IETF #86 Tuesday, March 12 2013, 13:00-15:00, room Caribbean 6
On 2/28/2013 10:53 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> For those that don't attend ietf meetings in person, there is usually
> live audio and jabber chat hooked up into the presentations.
>
> See y'all there, next month, in one form or another.
>
In the TSVAREA meeting, we've also set aside some time to talk
about AQM and whether there's interest and energy to do some
more specific work on AQM algs in the IETF (e.g. like CoDel and
PIE):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/86/agenda/tsvarea
I'm working with Martin on some slides to seed the discussion,
but we hope that it's mostly the community that we hear from,
following up in the higher-bandwidth face-to-face time from
the thread we had on the tsv-area@ietf.org mailing list a few
months ago.
--
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel