Just curious... have you run RRUL-style testing of mosh over a congested link? Not knowing in what way mosh is "UDP-based" I wonder what happens to it when you run a program like, say, "top", over mosh when there is heavy file transfer load. -----Original Message----- From: "Dave Taht" Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 9:27am To: "bloat" , "bloat-devel" , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] reproducing network research results with mosh http://reproducingnetworkresearch.wordpress.com/2013/03/14/mosh-cs244-13/ I embraced mosh wholeheartedly about a year ago. I've been installing it everywhere I go, with much of the same enthusiasm I had for putting mosaic on everything back in the early 90s. As a ssh replacement for interactive traffic, mosh is of tremendous use, particularly in the case where machines are suspended/resumed, move access points, or are experiencing wildly variable latency and/or long RTTs. It's now available across most unix OSes, and often installable via the standard package manager. http://mosh.mit.edu/ Try it! It would be awesome if this tech could make it into a generation of command line interfaces for embedded gear like routers and switches. However at the moment the server code requires C++ and libstd++, which makes it overlarge for the lowest end of gear. -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel