From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pd0-x229.google.com (mail-pd0-x229.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::229])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC0621F181;
	Tue,  9 Jul 2013 06:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id y10so5267492pdj.0
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 06:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references
	:content-type:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
	bh=+Ts7AKq//dhk7QHeKrAXe9Q8qoceng7qVuSqYuvD8ls=;
	b=Q+1CDjwVHV2lxAYpc8pWgp9uApzy/aJ8i5g/9oxLgIcwD8rMnvLrLLlGHcmGvTEB6T
	XR6kAlr5qeu6encALP5GFfLrikBKsmMySeVCLWlSI4Js1mz1nCcQjTajm8EGli+TrfGj
	oA2a8ruAppeSTwcksMY2ocQ1DkVzCau8y17+43bi0vkiFZN3GkjFdt9aV/nRdNaekmns
	0st8/5YjzBHue9DLpR5X8w+HXBVkjrhhdtGzUepgG3aecafneIwxIJ6F9KH+x5clByoE
	3W0J/qQ0lluBaLxg3bh7GvOSIJIg80zQybEm+DL0x2HNaIqTIFaHnD1qfeVTw8AZ+O0X
	Gv+w==
X-Received: by 10.66.27.114 with SMTP id s18mr27795235pag.98.1373376240991;
	Tue, 09 Jul 2013 06:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.248.202] ([172.19.248.202])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id eg3sm30253482pac.1.2013.07.09.06.24.00
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Tue, 09 Jul 2013 06:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1373376239.4979.150.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Toke =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 06:23:59 -0700
In-Reply-To: <874nc3x4e0.fsf@toke.dk>
References: <CAA93jw7WPdxKwGGvQoSEfmDN3ey9j7+BNT5yohB6XUyCqbQRtQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1307040751130.10894@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<1373223178.486913695@apps.rackspace.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1307080211340.10894@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<871u79x9kb.fsf@toke.dk>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1307090749480.8891@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<87obacw4gv.fsf@toke.dk> <1373374593.4979.142.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<874nc3x4e0.fsf@toke.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Codel] happy 4th!
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:24:01 -0000

On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 15:13 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:

> 
> Doesn't netem have an option to simulate reordering?

Its really too basic for my needs.

It decides to put the new packet at the front of transmit queue.

If you use netem to add a delay, then adding reordering is only a matter
of using a variable/randomized delay.