From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5206921F1B9;
	Fri,  6 Sep 2013 08:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id y10so3392467pdj.25
	for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
	bh=EaiD7n2nSPVkRYJrHCUrEaJsVM9iNXwuVeyX1Z4Rf/8=;
	b=z31KUMcBD6DhbybVxZfeD1S6QZyBGAslb1iAkRQbIFZyscKfZENKBW8S1Yz4lbiqA6
	20MRiuNfQ3E6vdhTtIk6jbbC+bxAh808h/ogKPY0Q+CUrkXBt+xdVcMVJZ1INjpFT8jx
	UpfG6ec7FjGzcqY3BUMXpX/yzZUgOPPO8YKog3WM4GkFEBeYLPlU7gf6JNsQaRqhu/Zd
	ATQUCbKJc0f0J6zVMlU7vW2pCR5v/bV9+oVIqHsl7VZBjW08w21VN5vHCKA4GmfTxeAc
	uXxuAsMBKk3+iH9Fx6eY/Dy40vW/UJ26vMVmgjvzW7thp7RW289QZ6mP1257gu6ApE4m
	f7ow==
X-Received: by 10.68.189.98 with SMTP id gh2mr3725932pbc.181.1378482507778;
	Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.29.161.5] ([172.29.161.5])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yo2sm5630044pab.8.1969.12.31.16.00.00
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1378482505.31445.27.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:48:25 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6ZqyAw5tAywMwTMafyP1qP1GBx_YbocVWbvwm20UF5SQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw6ZqyAw5tAywMwTMafyP1qP1GBx_YbocVWbvwm20UF5SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Codel] another sets of leaps forward for linux
	packet queueing
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:48:28 -0000

On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 13:47 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> 
> 
> Eric Dumazet just posted a pure fq scheduler (using the highly
> optimized red/black trees in the kernel) 
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=137740009008261&w=2
> 
> 
> which "scales to millions of concurrent flows per qdisc".Jon Corbet
> wrote it up in (subscriber only link) in lwn
> http://lwn.net/Articles/564978/

Dav, I saw your message on Facebook

Call me on 415-646-5783