From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Microsoft Secure Server Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94BD2200A2E for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:40:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail96-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.253) by VA3EHSOBE004.bigfish.com (10.7.40.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:40:12 +0000 Received: from mail96-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail96-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FFE3407C6 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:40:12 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: 0 X-BigFish: VPS0(zzzz1202hzz8275chz31h2a8h668h839h944hd25h) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.244.213; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:CH1PRD0510HT001.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI Received-SPF: softfail (mail96-va3: transitioning domain of dartware.com does not designate 157.56.244.213 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.244.213; envelope-from=richard.e.brown@dartware.com; helo=CH1PRD0510HT001.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ; Received: from mail96-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail96-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1331948410703113_15678; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3EHSMHS023.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.252]) by mail96-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC4B2C0264 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1PRD0510HT001.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.244.213) by VA3EHSMHS023.bigfish.com (10.7.99.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:40:10 +0000 Received: from CH1PRD0510MB381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.11.11]) by CH1PRD0510HT001.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.150.36]) with mapi id 14.16.0123.000; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:40:11 +0000 From: Richard Brown To: "" Thread-Topic: 3.3rc7-5 is out Thread-Index: AQHNA97kuzvNAMSmB0e/kVS+LX46nw== Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:40:10 +0000 Message-ID: <13814249-E286-4B88-9A1E-E900962BB9A4@intermapper.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.255.150.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <672D4F16E2052E48946725A16CCAAD8C@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: dartware.com Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.3rc7-5 is out X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:40:16 -0000 I just installed 3.3-rc7-5 and all seems fine in my limited testing.=20 I see there's a Network -> AQM tab in the GUI. It seems similar to the QoS = tab.=20 Should the doc's tell people to use the same procedure as the QoS? That is,= should people - Disable QoS (the default is disabled) - Run a speed test, say on http://speedtest.net - Enable QoS, and set the download and upload speeds to a few percent less = than the speedtest indicates. Thanks.