From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6100721F0A2 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:56:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA45F221D5 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:56:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from web2 ([10.202.2.212]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:56:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hand.ly; h= message-id:from:to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:in-reply-to:references:subject:date; s=mesmtp; bh= vRUrsgjQaO5XCFFaw1r8SkxdHpE=; b=dQqclFujFHyckOlm4OQLNnhNWi/+iVvi fAZuk02DnbX8NGlLmqFo3ZLoJR/JaLBlmlCs+Dg4MfAE2HdPksDF4HlTy0nLXzom pLCeg6cROj04FxZZNenQbw8/Y7eIfAVGRZFJytf1skZ78ViR/9Cr7YXTUT2k/M7g wWvMjxKZf5o= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=vRUrsgjQaO5XCFFaw1r8SkxdHpE=; b=q2M ObSswof+G0dQazLYqCPDInmQADBF53gbpsXWzQAT1iOlIZz0ORdhK5TKwKgBIfhb 8aiic73PVPUdWfpkYciBbW2PaW/d8reOOLOpCQNoGZwDpajpinwoE7rkj/TS3NDY 1EJb8acUMQnbwZO17WtInDSgr6LFEy3B7D4NTplU= Received: by web2.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id C913F5400DB; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:56:46 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1384199806.24597.46042401.31AD2A67@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: eYcLB5uVgsg1f6tLYaSwaB4JQyJgwxOAElTTjKmZl8X5 1384199806 From: Paul Handly To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d4893488 In-Reply-To: <11578.1384198837@sandelman.ca> References: <11578.1384198837@sandelman.ca> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:56:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] running cerowrt/*wrt in a VM X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:56:48 -0000 OpenWRT doesn't cut releases too often; you should find a much more recent build here: http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/x86/ -- Paul Handly On Mon, Nov 11, 2013, at 14:40, Michael Richardson wrote: > > I need to do some testing of PPPoE, DHCPv6 (RFC6204/homenet) with an > OpenWRT/CeroWRT. > > I want to do this virtually, so an x86 build would be best. I grabbed the > kvm > image of openwrt attitude adjustment, as per: > http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/qemu > and > http://downloads.openwrt.org/attitude_adjustment/12.09/ > > it appears that it hasn't got any IPv6 stuff in it. I thought that all > this > stuff from openwrt went upstream? Is 12.09 perhaps just too old? > > My choices are, I guess: > 1) build cerowrt for x86 > 2) build latest openwrt from source > > Or did I miss an obvious image? > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh > networks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network > architect [ > ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails > [ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel