From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A8E221F1E9 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3586A20D8A for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:00:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:00:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hand.ly; h= message-id:from:to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:in-reply-to:references:subject:date; s=mesmtp; bh= rSIokX9CbqDw9BiGef8N2NZ5JMI=; b=Hq9TKPz/DH6STiqWs26/6pNdSF0BYHdt eFy+RuYe4bE/glDZWnydzE3tpxe5tltgvTXbPRcij1S2JcksNOMc/3Rb1KAB3YxN vqTOAm15Cr0HywK1zxuM1cBtpIP2R9nUbUL5T7jJJs96dZEEA5y1rPXBcxEpiVz9 gEZarYdnKXs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=rSIokX9CbqDw9BiGef8N2NZ5JMI=; b=VKI /hFsMMVdHo+42SqPZS2mRPc5TzEjFSjavGoP+DYm2V2OD4b0pk+lj6i+N+jc5PIm 79tRRBozCQ02je+uv4EAHUKTlzDh4bSFHt5B6Q/odXbNDVzWF5ZW4MkvxATSOi03 Xom0S7Vshr47hsoH2G34o+gZwmMDj34dS1rmfvqg= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 0F2961074AF; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:00:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1395687647.30068.98319233.2EB0C1DF@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: heqrCrlP/rj2LciWqpe3sTsmULAhXP8/OW05aasrM2eL 1395687647 From: Paul Handly To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-6e382e84 In-Reply-To: <87r45rcxbb.fsf@toke.dk> References: <87r45rcxbb.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:00:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] upnp and PCP for ipv6 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:00:48 -0000 Back to My Mac (Apple's auto-VPN for iCloud-enabled macs) is where most of my miniupnpd registrations are coming from - I'm not sure if recent-vintage OS X attempts PCP+IPv6, but it just might. PCP looks like a descendant of NAT-PMP, which Apple kit definitely uses. Not that I can ever get BTMM to *work*, but I blame my iMac's flakey wake-on-wireless-lan behavior for that. --=20 Paul Handly On Mon, Mar 24, 2014, at 13:37, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > Dave Taht writes: >=20 > > Does anyone care/have a use for at the moment - pcp for ipv6? >=20 > Dual-homed torrent clients? Dunno if they try to do IPv6 pcp? >=20 > -Toke > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > Email had 1 attachment: > + signature.asc > 1k (application/pgp-signature)