From: Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] fast lanes
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 08:08:56 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1400227729.32180.1156.camel@pc2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4sboNcur7=EYLZ5XiGib76FU5hyHA2uck-y3cckerqjw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 18:03 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> A side note: It's taken me a long time to finally realize what was
> wrong with level3's recent blog posting here:
>
> http://blog.level3.com/global-connectivity/observations-internet-middleman/
>
> The loss chart on the right here that they show to support their
> argument that the current interconnects are "incurring excessive delay
> and loss" fails utterly to support their argument -
>
> http://blog.level3.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/route_info_1.jpg
>
> It SHOULD show diurnal variance, and doesn't. The loss rates it shows
> are both consistent and quite low, compared to the bandwidth being
> used up, (indicating more of a cabling problem? or excessive load on
> the other switch? or?)
The right graph is in log scale while the left i linear,
I'd say they show the same pattern.
As for loss rate, may be the real "big" loss number is on another
interface in the chain.
Sincerely,
Laurent
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-16 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-16 1:03 [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
2014-05-16 8:08 ` Laurent GUERBY [this message]
2014-05-16 8:12 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1400227729.32180.1156.camel@pc2 \
--to=laurent@guerby.net \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox