Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@reed.com>
Cc: Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com>,
	"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>,
	"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] DOCSIS 3+ recommendation?
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:04:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14520.1426874680@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 20 Mar 2015 07:08:27 -0700." <dd77bbfc-1bf6-433e-80d2-bf9b203a0051@reed.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 609 bytes --]

On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 07:08:27 -0700, "David P. Reed" said:

> M-Lab is better by far. But control by Google automatically discredits it's data.

> Criticizing M-LAB is just fodder fir the operators' lobby in DC.

I'm trying to get those two statements to play nice together, but keep having
to beat down the cognitive dissonance with a stick.

And why, exactly, are they automatically discredited?  Unless you live in one
of the very few places that has Google Fiber, you're someplace where Google
has a vested interest in improving the eyeball-to-content connection, because
they want to get content to you.


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 848 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-20 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-16 20:35 [Cerowrt-devel] " Matt Taggart
2015-03-17 23:32 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2015-03-18  4:34   ` David P. Reed
2015-03-18  6:26     ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-18 19:38       ` JF Tremblay
2015-03-18 19:50         ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-19 13:53           ` dpreed
2015-03-19 14:11             ` JF Tremblay
2015-03-19 15:38               ` dpreed
2015-03-19 15:40               ` Jim Gettys
2015-03-19 17:04                 ` Michael Richardson
2015-03-19 17:14                   ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-19 17:11             ` Dave Taht
2015-03-19 19:58               ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Livingood, Jason
2015-03-19 20:29                 ` dpreed
2015-03-19 23:18                   ` Greg White
2015-03-20  8:18                     ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-03-20 13:31                       ` David P. Reed
2015-03-20 13:46                         ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-20 14:05                         ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-03-20 10:07                     ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-20 13:50                     ` [Cerowrt-devel] Latency Measurements in Speed Test suites (was: DOCSIS 3+ recommendation?) Rich Brown
2015-03-29 17:36                       ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Pedro Tumusok
2015-03-30  7:06                         ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-20 13:57                     ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] DOCSIS 3+ recommendation? Livingood, Jason
2015-03-20 14:08                       ` David P. Reed
2015-03-20 14:14                         ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-03-20 14:48                           ` Matt Mathis
2015-03-20 18:04                         ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2015-03-20 13:48                 ` Jim Gettys
2015-03-20 14:11                   ` Livingood, Jason
2015-03-20 14:54                     ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 15:31                       ` Jim Gettys
2015-03-20 15:39                         ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 16:31                       ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-20 20:59                         ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 23:47                           ` David P. Reed
2015-03-21  0:08                             ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-21  0:03                           ` David Lang
2015-03-21  0:13                             ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2015-03-21  0:25                               ` David Lang
2015-03-21  0:34                                 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-21  0:38                                   ` David Lang
2015-03-21  0:43                                     ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-22  4:15                                 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-21  0:15                             ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-21  0:29                               ` David Lang
2015-03-22  4:10                                 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 18:14                     ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-18  8:06     ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14520.1426874680@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
    --to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dpreed@reed.com \
    --cc=g.white@CableLabs.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox