From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B41803B2A4
 for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
 Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:28:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247])
 by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0204420008;
 Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:28:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179)
 id 5E7C42302; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:28:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C66E1FD;
 Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:28:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6omcj3Z0c97=OuC=P0VpWW-h_i_sFh_c=YyU0L4z8Nag@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw4O3xdGJd+U1bTtC=_+PCxXVn7z4cx9A=DwUiT1Yt4e9Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <10E89375-2591-49B2-9A67-AA0E14B17649@fugue.com>
 <CAA93jw6omcj3Z0c97=OuC=P0VpWW-h_i_sFh_c=YyU0L4z8Nag@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;
 <'$9xN5Ub#
 z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <14715.1540337327.1@localhost>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:28:47 -0400
Message-ID: <14716.1540337327@localhost>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] meanwhile... .home, finally has a home.arpa.
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 <cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
 <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
 <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:28:48 -0000

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
    > 2 years back, I gave up on deploying ipv6 any further than the lab.
    > Getting dynamic ipv6 reliably into my production network... I gave up.
    > I asked for a static allocation from comcast, haven't heard back yet.

Dude.  Comcast is a residential monopoly ISP. Inappropriate for labs.
IPv6 is trivial with a reasonable ISP (I realize that almost an oxymoron)
I pay $125CDN/month for 50Mbs/10Mbs with /56 over VDSL2.
(That's for an all-you-can-eat business plan, with priority NOC access)

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [