Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dpreed@deepplum.com" <dpreed@deepplum.com>
To: "Joel Wirāmu Pauling" <joel@aenertia.net>
Cc: "Jonathan Morton" <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
	cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] KASLR: Do we have to worry about other arches than x86?
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 17:02:46 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515103366.261714700@apps.rackspace.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1986 bytes --]


Hmm... protection datacentres tend to require lower latencies than can be achieved running on hypervisors.
 
Which doesn't mean that some datacenters don't do that.
 
As far as NFV is concerned, Meltdown only breaks security if a userspace application is running on a machine where another user has data running through kernel address space. NFV environments don't tend to run NFV in userspace under an OS that has kernel data in the page tables that are reachable from CR3.
 
The key issue in Meltdown is that CR3 is not changed between userspace and kernelspace. Which means that the memory access pipeline in userspace can use a kernelspace address (what Intel calls a "linear" address) without a check that the pagetables enable userspace access. The check happens after the speculative execution of the memory access.
 
I repeat this, because many pseudo-experts who love to be quoted in the press as saying "be afraid, be very afraid" are saying a lot of nonsense about Meltdown and Sceptre. It seems to be an echo chamber effect - the papers were released yesterday afternoon, but in a rush to get "quoted", all the wannabe-quoted people are saying things that are just plain NOT TRUE.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: "Joel Wirāmu Pauling" <joel@aenertia.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 4:44pm
To: "Jonathan Morton" <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] KASLR: Do we have to worry about other arches than x86?






On 5 January 2018 at 01:09, Jonathan Morton <[ chromatix99@gmail.com ]( mailto:chromatix99@gmail.com )> wrote:


 I don't think we need to worry about it too much in a router context.  Virtual server folks, OTOH...



  - Jonathan Morton



​Disagree - The Router is pretty much synonymous with NFV​ 
​; I run my lede instances at home on hypervisors - and this is definitely the norm in Datacentres now. We need to work through this quite carefully. ​

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4140 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2018-01-04 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-04 22:02 dpreed [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-04 22:02 dpreed
2018-01-04 22:04 ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 22:12   ` dpreed
2018-01-01 23:08 Dave Taht
     [not found] ` <CAJq5cE23bbiPE0a_9zd1VLnO7=c7bjmwwxVwaD2=to3fg5TOjA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-01-01 23:27   ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-02 19:06 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-04 12:09   ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-04 13:38     ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 13:48       ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-04 13:59         ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 14:49           ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-04 14:53             ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 20:28               ` dpreed
2018-01-04 21:20                 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-04 21:40                 ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 21:51                   ` valdis.kletnieks
2018-01-04 21:44     ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2018-01-04 21:47       ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 21:52         ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2018-01-04 21:54           ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 21:57             ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
     [not found]           ` <1515103187.670416570@apps.rackspace.com>
2018-01-04 22:02             ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
     [not found]       ` <1515103048.715224709@apps.rackspace.com>
2018-01-04 22:00         ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2018-01-04 22:09           ` dpreed
2018-01-04 22:13             ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2018-01-04 22:15             ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 22:26             ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-04 22:35               ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1515103366.261714700@apps.rackspace.com \
    --to=dpreed@deepplum.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@aenertia.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox