From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp65.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp65.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0371D3BA8E for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:18:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp25.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp25.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7E8E025344; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:18:25 -0400 (EDT) X-SMTPDoctor-Processed: csmtpprox beta Received: from smtp25.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp25.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 78F4925520; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:18:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from app34.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by smtp25.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 615F625344; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:18:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Sender-Id: dpreed@deepplum.com Received: from app34.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by 0.0.0.0:25 (trex/5.7.12); Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:18:25 -0400 Received: from deepplum.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by app34.wa-webapps.iad3a (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD61A0044; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:18:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: dpreed@deepplum.com, from: dpreed@deepplum.com) with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:18:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Auth-ID: dpreed@deepplum.com Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:18:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "dpreed@deepplum.com" To: "Jim Gettys" Cc: "Dave Taht" , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_20180312131825000000_40060" Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Type: html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1520875105.31683592@apps.rackspace.com> X-Mailer: webmail/12.13.2-RC Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] spacebee X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:18:26 -0000 ------=_20180312131825000000_40060 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0AWell, that may be the case, but it's a non-scalable and highly corruptib= le system. IMO it's probably unnecesary, too. Space is actually quite big.= =0A =0A-----Original Message-----=0AFrom: "Jim Gettys" = =0ASent: Monday, March 12, 2018 12:26pm=0ATo: "Dave Taht" =0ACc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net=0ASubject: Re: [Cerowrt-deve= l] spacebee=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AI do believe that the international space treatie= s require our government to control all launches.=0ALaunching satellites wi= thout permission is a big no-no.=0ANote that according to the article, it i= s collision risk, rather than radio radiation, that is the issue here.=0AJi= m=0A=0A=0AOn Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Dave Taht <[ dave.taht@gmail.co= m ]( mailto:dave.taht@gmail.com )> wrote:=0AThis is awesome. The FCC (whic = still doesn't "get" spread spectrum=0A radio) just discovered it doesn't ha= ve authority over the airwaves of=0A the whole planet.=0A=0A[ https://spect= rum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/satellites/fcc-accuses-stealthy-startup-of= -launching-rogue-satellites ]( https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospac= e/satellites/fcc-accuses-stealthy-startup-of-launching-rogue-satellites )= =0A=0A --=0A=0A Dave T=C3=A4ht=0A CEO, TekLibre, LLC=0A[ http://www.teklibr= e.com ]( http://www.teklibre.com )=0A Tel: [ 1-669-226-2619 ]( tel:1-669-22= 6-2619 )=0A _______________________________________________=0A Cerowrt-deve= l mailing list=0A[ Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net ]( mailto:Cerowrt-de= vel@lists.bufferbloat.net )=0A[ https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cero= wrt-devel ]( https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel )=0A ------=_20180312131825000000_40060 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well, that may be the = case, but it's a non-scalable and highly corruptible system. IMO it's proba= bly unnecesary, too. Space is actually quite big.

=0A

-----Original Message-----
From: "= Jim Gettys" <jg@freedesktop.org>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 12= :26pm
To: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: cerowrt-dev= el@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] spacebee

=0A
=0A
=0A
I do believe that the inte= rnational space treaties require our government to control all launches.=0A
Launching sa= tellites without permission is a big no-no.
=0A
Note that according to the article, it is= collision risk, rather than radio radiation, that is the issue here.
= =0A
Jim
=0A=0A

=0A
On Mon= , Mar 12, 2018 at 12:13 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
=0A
This is awesome. The = FCC (whic still doesn't "get" spread spectrum
radio) just discovered = it doesn't have authority over the airwaves of
the whole planet.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/satelli= tes/fcc-accuses-stealthy-startup-of-launching-rogue-satellites

--

D= ave T=C3=A4ht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
= Tel: 1-669-226-2619
_____________= __________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bu= fferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat= .net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
=0A
= =0A
=0A
 ------=_20180312131825000000_40060--