[Cerowrt-devel] apparently this is an end goal of a lot of ipv6 work in the ietf

[Cerowrt-devel] apparently this is an end goal of a lot of ipv6 work in the ietf

[Dave Taht]

who knew?

https://www.ipv6plus.net/

-- 
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman

dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] apparently this is an end goal of a lot of ipv6 work in the ietf

[Sebastian Moeller]

But is it Turing complete?

> On Jul 2, 2020, at 20:04, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> who knew?
> 
> https://www.ipv6plus.net/
> 
> -- 
> "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
> relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
> 
> dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] apparently this is an end goal of a lot of ipv6 work in the ietf

[David P. Reed]

Interop 2019 gave this an award?

I have to say, it reads like a clone of the Bell System Technical Manual (or some of the LTE spec).

In the tutorial it doesn't seem to say what problem it is solving.

But hey, maybe the IAB loves it? They seem to be clueless as hell about internetworking as a concept, seeming to think thet "interoperation" is irrelevant, and that the job of the Internet is to defend a collusion of big corporations from being accused of anti-trust violation, by colluding to exclude folks who aren't insiders from connecting to the Internet without paying incumbents.


On Thursday, July 2, 2020 2:04pm, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com> said:

> who knew?
> 
> https://www.ipv6plus.net/
> 
> --
> "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
> relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
> 
> dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> 

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] apparently this is an end goal of a lot of ipv6 work in the ietf

[Valdis Klētnieks]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 226 bytes --]

On Thu, 02 Jul 2020 11:04:03 -0700, Dave Taht said:
> who knew?
>
> https://www.ipv6plus.net/

After reading a few things, y first thought was "This is what would happen
if they let Lennart Pottering re-engineer MPLS".

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] apparently this is an end goal of a lot of ipv6 work in the ietf

[Joel Wirāmu Pauling]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 733 bytes --]

I read this as basically Huawei and China led Consumers of Huawei kit.

I guess potentially if they can solve v6 fragmentation problems then I
would be for it, Segment routing, also should have been a thing for a long
time.

On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 09:31, Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>
wrote:

> On Thu, 02 Jul 2020 11:04:03 -0700, Dave Taht said:
> > who knew?
> >
> > https://www.ipv6plus.net/
>
> After reading a few things, y first thought was "This is what would happen
> if they let Lennart Pottering re-engineer MPLS".
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1519 bytes --]

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] apparently this is an end goal of a lot of ipv6 work in the ietf

[Michael Richardson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 840 bytes --]



Joel Wirāmu Pauling <joel@aenertia.net> wrote:
    > I read this as basically Huawei and China led Consumers of Huawei kit.

Yes.
I would not say that it's "IETF".
The IETF, as a group, doesn't believe in very much, sometimes not even running code :-(

    > I guess potentially if they can solve v6 fragmentation problems then I
    > would be for it, Segment routing, also should have been a thing for a long
    > time.

I think that there are some good outcomes to simplifying all forwarding
silicon to doing IPv6, and making everything else be an overlay/adaptation.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [



[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]