Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JF Tremblay <jean-francois.tremblay@viagenie.ca>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] DOCSIS 3+ recommendation?
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:38:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15A0911A-E3B7-440A-A26B-C5E1489EA98B@viagenie.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE2nLRKuq64vQgpPSQ01e2Mc5Vtguo6smQg+ySC8mLH=aQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1137 bytes --]



> On Mar 18, 2015, at 2:26 AM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> DOCSIS 3.1 mandates support for AQM (at minimum the PIE algorithm) in both CPE and head end. If you can get hold of a D3.1 modem […].
> 
That last part might involve robbing the house of a Comcast employee... ;) 

http://www.lightreading.com/cable/docsis/comcast-puts-docsis-31-live-in-the-field/d/d-id/714494 <http://www.lightreading.com/cable/docsis/comcast-puts-docsis-31-live-in-the-field/d/d-id/714494>

No D3.1 hardware is certified at this point, the chipsets are just barely out and still experimental. Customers probably won’t see D31 hardware before 2016. 

Btw, in my experience, modems and CMTSes have no AQM at all configured. And the buffers are large, in both directions. The more recent the model, the more buffer it usually has (hey, more speed requires more buffer, right?). I’ve seen multiple Mb in some models, can’t remember the exact amount, but it might have been 2-4 Mb for my current TM702. So the worst case is actually to have a very recent modem with a lower-tier speed (like a 10 Mbps). 

JF





[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1884 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-18 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-16 20:35 Matt Taggart
2015-03-17 23:32 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2015-03-18  4:34   ` David P. Reed
2015-03-18  6:26     ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-18 19:38       ` JF Tremblay [this message]
2015-03-18 19:50         ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-19 13:53           ` dpreed
2015-03-19 14:11             ` JF Tremblay
2015-03-19 15:38               ` dpreed
2015-03-19 15:40               ` Jim Gettys
2015-03-19 17:04                 ` Michael Richardson
2015-03-19 17:14                   ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-19 17:11             ` Dave Taht
2015-03-19 19:58               ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Livingood, Jason
2015-03-19 20:29                 ` dpreed
2015-03-19 23:18                   ` Greg White
2015-03-20  8:18                     ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-03-20 13:31                       ` David P. Reed
2015-03-20 13:46                         ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-20 14:05                         ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-03-20 10:07                     ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-20 13:50                     ` [Cerowrt-devel] Latency Measurements in Speed Test suites (was: DOCSIS 3+ recommendation?) Rich Brown
2015-03-29 17:36                       ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Pedro Tumusok
2015-03-30  7:06                         ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-20 13:57                     ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] DOCSIS 3+ recommendation? Livingood, Jason
2015-03-20 14:08                       ` David P. Reed
2015-03-20 14:14                         ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-03-20 14:48                           ` Matt Mathis
2015-03-20 18:04                         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2015-03-20 13:48                 ` Jim Gettys
2015-03-20 14:11                   ` Livingood, Jason
2015-03-20 14:54                     ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 15:31                       ` Jim Gettys
2015-03-20 15:39                         ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 16:31                       ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-20 20:59                         ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 23:47                           ` David P. Reed
2015-03-21  0:08                             ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-21  0:03                           ` David Lang
2015-03-21  0:13                             ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2015-03-21  0:25                               ` David Lang
2015-03-21  0:34                                 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-21  0:38                                   ` David Lang
2015-03-21  0:43                                     ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-22  4:15                                 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-21  0:15                             ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-21  0:29                               ` David Lang
2015-03-22  4:10                                 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 18:14                     ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-18  8:06     ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15A0911A-E3B7-440A-A26B-C5E1489EA98B@viagenie.ca \
    --to=jean-francois.tremblay@viagenie.ca \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox