Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@deepplum.com>
To: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 2.5gbit for $59
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:11:31 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1654189891.625331931@apps.rackspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6TrRg7kPV9bEv422d8r3SO1VrCRv8vV3V2-W4aif6z1Q@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1655 bytes --]


There are small, low-TDP Intel systems for  up to ~$250 or so (including case) that use current generation Celerons with 4 2.5 GigE ports, and with the I/O bandwidth to easily support a full-on router at wirespeed on those ports.
 
I'm thinking of upgrading my entry-router (which is based on Fedora Server 36 now, not Cerowrt, just because that's my general go-to distro on x86_64 and Aarch64) from an old Celeron system with two full speed 1 GigE ports to 2.5 GigE, in advance of my expectation that 2.5 GigE DOCSIS 3.1 will become cheap enough soon at my home.
 
The problem with the low-end boards is that you need enough PCIe lanes to move packets at 10 Gb/sec bidirectionally. The contained ARM chips may be fast enough in principle, but the board and the PCIe are a bottleneck.
 
AliExpress sells such boards and also barebones, but prices and specs vary.
 
On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 8:05pm, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com> said:



> "LAN – 2x 2.5GbE RJ45 ports (via 2x Realtek RTL8125BG PCIe controller)
> tested up to 2.35 Gbps (Rx) and 1.85 Gbps (Tx)
> WAN – 1x Gigabit Ethernet RJ45 port (via Realtek RTL8211F) tested up
> to 941 Mbps (Tx and Rx)"
> 
> My guess is - none of these at the same time. Still... $59!
> 
> 
> https://www.cnx-software.com/2022/05/30/buy-nanopi-r5s-rockchip-rk3568-mini-router-sbc/
> 
> 
> --
> FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2875 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-02 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-01  0:05 Dave Taht
2022-06-01  1:23 ` Etienne Champetier
2022-06-02 17:11 ` David P. Reed [this message]
2022-06-02 20:29   ` Matt Taggart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1654189891.625331931@apps.rackspace.com \
    --to=dpreed@deepplum.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox